1993
DOI: 10.1080/10168739300000014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exchange Rate Distortion and Economic Growth in Ghana

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the empirical evidence, Ehinomen and Oladipo (2012) suggested that the government should guide its exchange rate management policy in order to boost exchange rate appreciation and further condense the cost of production in the manufacturing sector that depends heavily on foreign inputs, while there should be simultaneously a total ban on the importation of consumer and intermediate goods that can be or are manufactured locally. Gyimah-Brempon and Gyapong (1993)…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the empirical evidence, Ehinomen and Oladipo (2012) suggested that the government should guide its exchange rate management policy in order to boost exchange rate appreciation and further condense the cost of production in the manufacturing sector that depends heavily on foreign inputs, while there should be simultaneously a total ban on the importation of consumer and intermediate goods that can be or are manufactured locally. Gyimah-Brempon and Gyapong (1993)…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a number of studies dealing with multiple exchange‐rate systems, which can have a deleterious effect on economic growth (Bhagwati, 1978; Edwards, 1989) in terms of reduced investment and international trade (Gyimah‐Brempong and Gyapong, 1993), leading to low or negative growth rates in per capita income, exports, and agricultural output (Bagachwa and Naho, 1994; Cottani et al, 1990; Ghura and Grennes 1992; Nkurunziza, 2002). In the presence of exchange‐rate distortion, the use of nominal exchange rates for international comparisons introduces bias into economic calculations and analyses (Bojnec et al, 1997), causes misallocation of foreign exchange reserves, and can lead to ambiguous policy effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the presence of exchange‐rate distortion, the use of nominal exchange rates for international comparisons introduces bias into economic calculations and analyses (Bojnec et al, 1997), causes misallocation of foreign exchange reserves, and can lead to ambiguous policy effects. Considering that most of the poor in less developed countries (LDCs) are in rural areas, where the agricultural sector has been penalized by currency controls (Ellis, 1992), the removal of exchange‐rate distortions should help both economic efficiency and social welfare by improving producer incentives (Husain, 2001), and enhance the growth prospects of LDCs (Gyimah‐Brempong and Gyapong, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%