Exchange rate comovements, hedging and volatility spillovers on new EU forex markets

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. We analyze time-varying exchange rate co-movements and volatility spillovers between the Czech koruna, the Polish zloty, the Hungarian forint and the dollar/euro from 1999 to 2016. We apply the dynamic conditional correlations (DCC) model and the Diebold Yilmaz spillover index to examine the periods prior to and during the GFC, plus during and after the EU debt crisis. We found declining conditional correlations between new EU exchange rates prior to both crises. During the GFC and the European debt crisis, the correlations reach the lowest level, and increase afterwards. Based on the DCC model results we calculate portfolio weights and hedge ratios. We show that during both crises portfolio diversification benefits increase but hedging costs rise as well. Based on the spillover index we document that during calm periods most of the volatilities are due to each currency's own history. However, during the distress periods volatility spillovers among currencies increase substantially. Terms of use: Documents in

Dynamic return and volatility spillovers among S&P 500, crude oil, and gold

“…They evidenced that oil and gold market are the net receivers of risk spillovers with the energy, financial, technology and telecommunications subsectors of the DJIM index, whereas the consumer goods, consumer services, health care, industrials, utilities subsectors of DJIM index are the net transmitters. Last but not least, more recent studies such as Restrepo, Uribe, and Manotas (2018), Wang and Guo (2018), Liow, Liao, and Huang (2018), Antonakakis, Cunado, Filis, Gabauer, and De Gracia (2018), Collet and Lelpo (2018), Ahmad, Mishra, and Daly (2018), Ordu‐Akkaya, Ugurlu‐Yildirim, and Soytas (2018), Wang and Wu (2018), Kočenda and Moravcova (2018), Rohit and Dash (2018), and Pavlova, de Boyrie, and Parhizgari (2018) have used the DY spillover index to investigate the intercontinental, intercountry and/or intersectoral return and/or volatility spillovers for energy, commodity and financial assets and indices.…”

Is the Market Efficiency Hypothesis Applicable in the Czech Republic – FOREX Case

“…The data sample for previous research consists of the US currency rates to Japan, Great Britain and the Euro area. Kočenda and Moravcová [15] divided the period after GFC (2008-09) into two subsamples according to EU debt crisis. They concluded about the declining conditional correlations among the new EU exchange rates prior to both crises.…”

Dynamic correlation and volatility spillover between the stock markets of Shenzhen and Hong Kong

“…The estimation results are listed in Tables 7 and 8, where market 1 represents Shenzhen stock market and market 2 represents Hong Kong stock market. Based on these results, we can further analyze the changes of volatility spillover effect before and after the opening of SHSC [41]. Table 7 B are the coefficient matrixes after the opening of the SHSC.…”