2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2011.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exchange rate bubbles: Fundamental value estimation and rational expectations test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This calculation is done by multiplying the bilateral nominal exchange rate by the ratio of the consumer price index (CPI) in the US to the CPI of each country. In this case, the fundamental price of the asset (currency) is the evolution of the international price ratio, following the purchase power parity theory (see Maldonado et al ., ). We limit our analysis to periods in which exchange rates have freely floated according to Levy‐Yeyati and Sturzenegger's () de‐facto classification (Table ).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This calculation is done by multiplying the bilateral nominal exchange rate by the ratio of the consumer price index (CPI) in the US to the CPI of each country. In this case, the fundamental price of the asset (currency) is the evolution of the international price ratio, following the purchase power parity theory (see Maldonado et al ., ). We limit our analysis to periods in which exchange rates have freely floated according to Levy‐Yeyati and Sturzenegger's () de‐facto classification (Table ).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Maldonado et al . () used the same method and applied it to the Brazilian case, but also failed to detect bubbles in the bilateral exchange rate with the US.…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elwood et al (1999) applied state-space models and Monte Carlo experiments to the Japanese and German exchange rate series and did find strong evidence of a deviation from white noise that is consistent with the existence of a stochastic rational bubble which burst between April and May of 1990, when it was a period of considerable turmoil in the Japanese and German financial markets. Maldonado et al (2012) set-up three models to test the significance of speculative bubbles that may have occurred in the period that is considered. The results could not reject the null hypothesis that rational bubbles exist at the 5% significance level.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among others, van Norden and Schaller (1993), van Norden and Vigfusson (1998) and Brooks and Katsaris (2005) apply them to stock markets. van Norden (1996) and Maldonado et al (2012) use these models to test for bubbles in exchange rate markets, while Anderson et al (2011) do the same for real estate. And these two models have also been used to test for bubbles in oil prices by Shi and Arora (2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%