Exchange quality in teacher leadership ties: examining relational quality using social network and leader-member exchange theories

Abstract

PurposeThis study examines the relational dynamics between teachers and formal teacher leaders (TLs). We examine the association between relationship structure and leader-member exchange (LMX) quality and the extent to which LMX mediates the relationship between social network (SN) measures of dyadic relationships and TL influence.Design/methodology/approachUsing survey data from 1,895 teacher-TL relationships, we employ path mediation analysis using hierarchical linear modeling.FindingsOur results indicate that voluntary advice-seeking and multiplex ties are associated with stronger exchange quality between teachers and TLs. In addition, LMX partially mediates the relationship between voluntary ties and TL influence.Originality/valueSN and LMX theories offer two complementary lenses for studying relational dynamics in organizations, though they seldom are used together, especially in education. This study bridges SN and LMX theories and measures to bolster studies of relational dynamics in organizations and highlights that in the case of formal teacher leadership, there is a need for school structures that enable teachers and TLs to seek out one another informally and develop strong social exchanges.

Leading From the Middle: How Principals Rely on District Guidance and Organizational Conditions in Times of Crisis

“…OL may be stifled when leaders challenge preexisting conditions and ways of operating (Hallett, 2010; Spillane et al, 2002) or do not take into consideration preexisting relationships among staff (Lockton, 2019). Furthermore, social network scholarship highlights how the quality of relationships in schools is perhaps just as important as the structure of teachers’ social networks (Comstock et al, 2021; Kaul et al, 2021). As such, understanding how principals lead their schools through organizational change requires attending to both the organizational structures and conditions which they leverage.…”

“…Given the nature of our data and focus of our study, we do not provide evidence for shifts in schools' organizational learning outcomes; however, we include these outcomes in our conceptual framework as a hypothesis to investigate in future studies. 4 networks (Comstock et al, 2021;Kaul et al, 2021). As such, understanding how principals lead their schools through organizational change requires attending to both the organizational structures and conditions which they leverage.…”

Stepping in or Stepping On: Mentor Teachers’ Preferences for Mentoring Inside and Outside of Interactive Teaching

“…Such mentoring practices help novices learn to think on their feet and adjust their instructional moves in response to their students’ thinking and learning needs in the moment. They also depend on a trusting and open relationship between mentor and novice and a new set of expectations about what student teaching is for and how mentors can help novices learn to teach (Comstock et al, 2021; Feiman-Nemser & Buchmann, 1987).…”