2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.91.125133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exchange parameters of strongly correlated materials: Extraction from spin-polarized density functional theory plus dynamical mean-field theory

Abstract: In this paper we present an accurate numerical scheme for extracting interatomic exchange parameters (J ij ) of strongly correlated systems, based on first-principles full-potential electronic structure theory. The electronic structure is modeled with the help of a full-potential linear muffin-tin orbital method. The effects of strong electron correlations are considered within the charge self-consistent density functional theory plus dynamical mean-field theory. The exchange parameters are then extracted usin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
97
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(136 reference statements)
8
97
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The so-called muffin-tin head projection scheme was applied to construct the set of localized Cr-d orbitals (for more details see Ref. [42]). The J ij 's were extracted from both ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic configurations.…”
Section: Dft Computational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The so-called muffin-tin head projection scheme was applied to construct the set of localized Cr-d orbitals (for more details see Ref. [42]). The J ij 's were extracted from both ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic configurations.…”
Section: Dft Computational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surprisingly, dynamical electron correlations using LSDA+DMFT lead only to small corrections in the exchange interactions compared to LSDA+U (J 1 = −0.03 meV and J 2 = −6.8 meV) for NiO and static local correlations capture most of the essential modifications. [42] Among the different methods, the J 1 interaction shows a spread of 0.7 meV. However, from the experimental point of view, the magnitude and even sign of J 1 remain uncertain.…”
Section: Niomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simple rock-salt structure along with the inability of regular DFT functionals to correctly describe these materials, make NiO and MnO typical benchmark systems to test methods for the calculation of exchange interactions in strongly correlated systems. Beyond the DFT methods such as LDA+U, [34,44,45] hybrid functionals, [46,47] the self-interaction correction, [41,48] GW approximation [49] and dynamical mean-field theory [42,50] have been used successfully to improve the correspondence between calculations and experiments in these materials. [34,42,46,47] In contrast, LSIC overestimates the electron localization, leading to a slight underestimation of the exchange interactions.…”
Section: Niomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This contribution is much stronger in our case, and it overcomes the FM part of the exchange. Similar competition was shown to take place for the next NN exchange couplings in bulk Fe, which corresponds to the same coordination shell that we investigate here [41]. However, the balance between the two contributions can be easily changed by small changes in the NN distance.…”
Section: The (001) Surfacementioning
confidence: 76%
“…[41]. For the sake of simplicity, relativistic effects will not be considered in our work unless explicitly stated.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%