2000
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2000.1100410.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exchange of oxygen and its role in energy dissipation during drought stress in tomato plants

Abstract: To elucidate how excess light energy is dissipated during water deficit, net photosynthesis (PN), stomatal conductance (gs), intercellular CO2 concentration (ci) and Chl a fluorescence were investigated in control and drought‐stressed tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum). Gross O2 evolution (Eo) and gross O2 uptake (Uo) were determined by a mass spectrometric 16O/18O2 isotope technique. Under drought stress PN, gs, ci and Uo decline. While photochemical fluorescence quenching decreases under water deficit, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(66 reference statements)
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the low irradiances during our experiment in winter, q N increased rather moderate under severe stress, but thermal dissipation of absorbed photon energy is well established in studies with higher irradiances (Flexas and Medrano 2002). Haupt-Herting and Fock (2000) demonstrated in tomato that under 90 µmol m −2 s −1 , q N increased but to a lower extent compared to the same stress at 400 µmol m −2 s −1 . The effects on q N and q P for both irradiances were also moderate in tomato for Ψ w of −1.2 MPa, but were very pronounced for Ψ w of −2.0 MPa.…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Due to the low irradiances during our experiment in winter, q N increased rather moderate under severe stress, but thermal dissipation of absorbed photon energy is well established in studies with higher irradiances (Flexas and Medrano 2002). Haupt-Herting and Fock (2000) demonstrated in tomato that under 90 µmol m −2 s −1 , q N increased but to a lower extent compared to the same stress at 400 µmol m −2 s −1 . The effects on q N and q P for both irradiances were also moderate in tomato for Ψ w of −1.2 MPa, but were very pronounced for Ψ w of −2.0 MPa.…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…This great controversy about the photoprotective function of photorespiration exists for many years (Osmond and Björkman 1972). On the one hand, photorespiration can protect the photosynthetic apparatus against photodamage (Osmond and Björkman 1972, Katona et al 1992, Park et al 1996, Osmond et al 1997, and the photoprotective function of photorespiration could be particularly important under high PPFD in DS-leaves (Osmond and Grace 1995, Kozaki and Takeka 1996, Wingler et al 1999, Haupt-Herting and Fock 2000, Guan et al 2004, Streb et al 2005. On the other hand, some researchers (Brestic et al 1995, Meng et al 1999, Nogués and Alegre 2002 suggest that photorespiration does not play significant role in protection of photosynthetic apparatus against photodamage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A possible indicator of the incorporation of inorganic P in organic compounds is the level of the nucleotides NADP and NADPH, although normally the status of these levels has been related to the appearance of some type of stress that reduces their concentration by altering photosynthetic processes (Haupt-Herting and Fock 2000). The lowering of the NADP + NADPH concentration with high foliar-application rates of Phi (0.5 and 1 mM) suggests that these treatments are not effective from the standpoint of P incorporation in these compounds (Table 4).…”
Section: Bioindicators Of Pmentioning
confidence: 99%