2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4929526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exchange coupling transformations in Cu (II) heterospin complexes of “breathing crystals” under structural phase transitions

Abstract: Family of "breathing crystals" is the polymer-chain complexes of Cu(hfac) 2 with nitroxides. The polymer chains consist of one-, two-or three-spin clusters. The "breathing crystals" experience simultaneous magnetic and Jahn-Teller type structural phase transitions with change of total cluster spin and drastic change of bond lengths (ca. 10-12%). For the first time the intra-cluster magnetic couplings in "breathing crystals" have been calculated both by band structure methods GGA+U and hybrid DFT (B3LYP and PBE… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(40 reference statements)
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike the previously reported periodic calculations on breathing crystals, in our calculations the experimental space group for each system is employed ( P true1 for compounds 2 and 3 in both temperatures, P 2 1 / c and C 2/ c for compound 1 at low and room temperatures, respectively), with unit cells of 552, 170 and 162 atoms for compounds 1, 2 and 3 respectively. Hence, our calculations take into account the interchain interactions, neglected in the works by Morozov et al . as a consequence of the reduced crystal symmetry used in their calculations.…”
Section: Computational Detailssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unlike the previously reported periodic calculations on breathing crystals, in our calculations the experimental space group for each system is employed ( P true1 for compounds 2 and 3 in both temperatures, P 2 1 / c and C 2/ c for compound 1 at low and room temperatures, respectively), with unit cells of 552, 170 and 162 atoms for compounds 1, 2 and 3 respectively. Hence, our calculations take into account the interchain interactions, neglected in the works by Morozov et al . as a consequence of the reduced crystal symmetry used in their calculations.…”
Section: Computational Detailssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Comparing with the results obtained for Cu(hfac) 2 L Bu ⋅ 0.5 C 8 H 18 ( 2 ) complex from DDCI calculations on the spin triad ( J =−145.3 cm −1 and 8.7 cm −1 for the LT and HT phases, respectively, using the quartet CASSCF(3/3) molecular orbitals in the configuration interaction expansion), the J constants at PBE+ U d + U p level are those in better agreement with the DDCI ones, although always larger in amplitude for both phases. This overestimation is a well‐known feature of the DFT‐based evaluations of the magnetic coupling constants, extensively discussed in the past for many magnetic binuclear compounds, and also found for the family of Cu(hfac) 2 L R breathing crystals . The interchain interaction is antiferromagnetic in nature and of the same order of magnitude as the J value within the spin triads at high temperature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DFT + U method incorporates additional energy factors for delocalization of the d‐orbitals. The formalism of Dudarev et al with the U‐J values of 7 eV and 6 eV was used for Cu and Ni, respectively, which have shown to yield results that are in good agreement in terms of lattice parameters and magnetization with those obtained from experiments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…It should be noted that relatively few references on the works, describing such techniques (e. g. DFT+ U + J method) can be found in the literature to date. Moreover, even less papers include actual application of these methods in their studies . Clearly more tests on application of thus extended DFT+ U method is needed in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(7). However, within the recent years, realization is growing that interactions between the electrons with the opposite spins should also be corrected . We presented such correction in the following form: trueEHub-EDC=σU-J2Tr[]nσ(1-nσ)+σU2Tr[nσn-σ]-E-σσDC …”
Section: Computational Methods: Overview and Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%