Comprehensive Inorganic Chemistry II 2013
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-097774-4.00922-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exchange Coupling in Di- and Polynuclear Complexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 689 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accurate calculation of this energy difference remains a challenge for DFT methods. While DFT has widely succeeded in the calculation of other physical properties, such as exchange coupling constants, the calculation of energy gaps between electronic states remains a difficult task. The TPSSh functional has been widely used in the field of SCO systems, but basically focused on Fe II systems, , while its application to other SCO systems of the first transition metal remained undisclosed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accurate calculation of this energy difference remains a challenge for DFT methods. While DFT has widely succeeded in the calculation of other physical properties, such as exchange coupling constants, the calculation of energy gaps between electronic states remains a difficult task. The TPSSh functional has been widely used in the field of SCO systems, but basically focused on Fe II systems, , while its application to other SCO systems of the first transition metal remained undisclosed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimentally, the magnetic exchange interaction J is evaluated by fitting the temperature dependent magnetic susceptibility data. 20 For dinuclear complexes, extracting the J values is rather straightforward; however, for polynuclear complexes with multiple J values, two issues mainly arise: (i) employing several J values for polynuclear complexes is likely to lead to over-parameterization in the fitting procedure, where featureless susceptibility data are often employed to fit a number of variables. At the same time, if fewer than the minimum required number of parameters are employed, this can lead to an over-simplified Hamiltonian (note that next-nearest-neighbour interactions are often ignored, and similar J parameters for interactions not equivalent by symmetry are assumed).…”
Section: Modelling Spin Hamiltonian Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solution-phase magnetic moment is weakly temperature dependent over the range from 200 K to 298 K, suggesting the complex has an S = 2 ground state with low-lying excited states that are thermally-accessible. Electronic structure calculations of a truncated model of the cluster (Fe9O6(H)6(NH3)6) using the broken-symmetry formalism 31,32 are consistent with strong antiferromagnetic coupling leading to an S = 2 ground state (5 α Fe(II) + 4 β Fe(II)), with an energetically-accessible S = 6 excited state (6 α Fe(II) + 3 β Fe(II), +6.8 kcal/mol, expected μeff value = 13.0). The two electronic configurations differ in the relative spin orientation of one of the axial Fe atoms, wherein the first excited state has all the axial Fe environments antiferromagnetically coupled to the equatorial environments (Figure S4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%