1967
DOI: 10.1063/1.1712098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exchange-Charge-Model Calculation of the Born—Mayer Repulsive Potential in Ionic Gases and Crystals

Abstract: By considering the deformation of the free ions and within the framework of the exchange charge model (ECM) of Dick and Overhauser and the technique of symmetrical orthoganalization of Löwdin, we have calculated the radial dependence of the repulsive potential for ionic gases and solids. The repulsive potential is considered to be a summation of the electrostatic energy between effective nuclear charges and the exchange charges, and it very closely fits the form of the Born—Mayer repulsive potential, B exp(—r/… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there is still qualitative agreement between the data and the ionic model, the discrepancies are such that the exponential form used for the repulsive potential appears to become too hard (too large a second derivative, resulting in too high an average frequency) upon compression when compared with the observed properties. It is conceivable that slightly improved values could be found for the parameters in the crystal-independent potential models based on such a comparison [e.g., Sirdeshmukh and Rao, 1975]; however, the more fundamental assumption concerning the validity of an exponential repulsive (and in general, central forces) term, separable from the Coulomb term in the ionic potential, needs also to be addressed [see Hafemeister and Flygare, 1965;Hafemeister and Zahrt, 1967;Gilbert, 1968;Carlson, 1973;Davies, 1981].…”
Section: Negligible and All Terms Decrease In Absolute Magnitude Witmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is still qualitative agreement between the data and the ionic model, the discrepancies are such that the exponential form used for the repulsive potential appears to become too hard (too large a second derivative, resulting in too high an average frequency) upon compression when compared with the observed properties. It is conceivable that slightly improved values could be found for the parameters in the crystal-independent potential models based on such a comparison [e.g., Sirdeshmukh and Rao, 1975]; however, the more fundamental assumption concerning the validity of an exponential repulsive (and in general, central forces) term, separable from the Coulomb term in the ionic potential, needs also to be addressed [see Hafemeister and Flygare, 1965;Hafemeister and Zahrt, 1967;Gilbert, 1968;Carlson, 1973;Davies, 1981].…”
Section: Negligible and All Terms Decrease In Absolute Magnitude Witmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Thomas–Fermi–Dirac statistical and self-consistent-field theories give reliable results that the vdW repulsion energy ( V rep ) can be very well fitted by a simple exponential Born–Mayer term, , V rep ( R ) = A exp­(− bR ), where A and b are constants. Starting from the Schrodinger equation and taking H 2 as a model system, we rededuce the expression of the ground state energy of H 2 at a larger distance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As R decreases, the exponential term is increasingly important; ignoring the other terms makes R –2 n –2 dominant, leading to the potential diverging to negative infinity. According to eq , when R is large enough, the dispersion can be approximately with asymptotic multipole expansion, but when simply add the expansion with the Born–Mayer term, , it will cause the potential to dive toward negative infinity like Exp-6 potential . One way to deal with this problem is introducing in damping function as Tang and Toennies et al did. However, the form of the damping function such as Tang and Toennies is too complicate to be used in a molecular mechanic force field.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Values of ionic radii and coefficients Pij have been taken from Pauling[29]. repulsive hardness parameters p have been used as those derived from overlap integrals[30]. The repulsive strength parameter b and the van der Waals constant Cdd are calculated from the crystal equilibrium condition and the expression for the SOE constant Cll given by Garg et al[9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%