2014
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/47/25/255002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exchange bias in (FeNi/IrMn)nmultilayer films evaluated by static and dynamic techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the distribution of the strain throughout the multilayer may induce randomly oriented local anisotropies, leading to differences in the exchange coupling of distinct interfaces. Similar behavior have been previously verified for NiFe/IrMn multilayers [15]. For NiFe layers thicker than 20 nm, the relaxation of the stress is enough to vanish this effect.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In this case, the distribution of the strain throughout the multilayer may induce randomly oriented local anisotropies, leading to differences in the exchange coupling of distinct interfaces. Similar behavior have been previously verified for NiFe/IrMn multilayers [15]. For NiFe layers thicker than 20 nm, the relaxation of the stress is enough to vanish this effect.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Figure 1a shows a schematic of the GMR SHO device. The device is a nanowire made from antiferromagnetic (AFM)/FM/NM/FM/Pt exchange biased spin valve multilayer, where the direction of magnetization of the bottom FM layer is pinned by exchange bias field from the AFM layer [38][39][40] . Direct electric current flowing along the nanowire in the heavy metal Pt layer applies SHT to magnetization of the adjacent free FM layer and excites its auto-oscillations 15 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The similar coercivities between samples at room temperature but largely differing H EB values are consistent with previous studies. 16 H EB can be determined dynamically from the FMR measurements taking half of the sum of resonance fields, H R , at a given frequency for fields along (0 • ) H EB as well as antiparallel to (180 • ) H EB . Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thickness of the individual ferromagnetic layers and number of repetitions across the samples are given by t = 20, 60, 80 nm and n = 10, 5, 4, and the samples are named S1, S2, S3, respectively (see Table 1 in Ref. 16). The samples were cut to similar sizes for experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation