2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2021.11.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excessive Functional Coupling With Less Variability Between Salience and Default Mode Networks in Autism Spectrum Disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analysis of intra-and inter-network FCs revealed differential changes in FCs in association with ASD traits. Our results are partially consistent with those of previous rs-and task-based fMRI studies (21,23,(71)(72)(73)(74)(75). In particular, we note the decreased FCs within the SN during the rest period.…”
Section: Relationship Between Asd Traits and The Triple Networksupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our analysis of intra-and inter-network FCs revealed differential changes in FCs in association with ASD traits. Our results are partially consistent with those of previous rs-and task-based fMRI studies (21,23,(71)(72)(73)(74)(75). In particular, we note the decreased FCs within the SN during the rest period.…”
Section: Relationship Between Asd Traits and The Triple Networksupporting
confidence: 92%
“…For instance, previous studies described specific alterations in resting‐state activity for the salience network during development in response to early trauma and in relation to ADHD (Rogers et al., 2021; Zhao et al., 2021). Moreover, DMN development during late childhood and adolescence has been previously described as influencing both physiological growth (Lei et al., 2022; Spencer‐Smith & Anderson, 2009) and abnormal psychopathology (Via et al., 2021), dynamically integrating with the salience network during typical development in order to modulate cognitive or social responsiveness (Chen et al., 2022; Valera‐Bermejo et al., 2021). A small effect for age was previously shown for the resting‐state activity of the DMN—in a sample of adults (Bluhm et al., 2008)—while the current study indicates medium age effects in the same region from 7 to 18 years of age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Signaling from limbic regions to the SAL has also been identified as key differentiator of both ADHD diagnosis and symptom presentation (Damiani et al, 2021). SAL dysfunction has also been associated with inattention in other disorders, such as multiple sclerosis and ASD (Chen et al, 2021; Loitfelder et al, 2012). Age related differences in LC-SAL connectivity have also been observed in older adult samples (Lee et al, 2020; Liebe et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%