2018
DOI: 10.1093/jas/skx041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excessive backfat of sows at 109 d of gestation induces lipotoxic placental environment and is associated with declining reproductive performance1

Abstract: This study investigated the influence of sow backfat thickness at 109 d of gestation on sow and piglet performance. Data from 846 farrowing multiparous Yorkshire sows with parity from 3 to 5 were collected from a pig breeding farm. Sows were divided into six groups based on backfat thickness (≤16, 17-18, 19-20, 21-22, 23-24, and ≥25 mm) at 109 d of gestation. The evaluation of reproductive performance included the litter size, litter weight at birth and at weaning of 21 d, weight of placenta at parturition, pl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
43
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(37 reference statements)
5
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, our results showed that the excessive backfat thickness (≥21 mm) of Landrance × Large White sows at day 109 of gestation decreased the total number and litter weight of piglets born alive. Similar to the results of this study, Zhou et al [5] observed that increased backfat thickness of Large White sows at day 109 of gestation had a convex quadratic relationship with litter weight of piglets born alive. Torres-Rovira et al [25] showed that the proportion of low birth weight in excessive backfat thickness sows was more than 20%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the current study, our results showed that the excessive backfat thickness (≥21 mm) of Landrance × Large White sows at day 109 of gestation decreased the total number and litter weight of piglets born alive. Similar to the results of this study, Zhou et al [5] observed that increased backfat thickness of Large White sows at day 109 of gestation had a convex quadratic relationship with litter weight of piglets born alive. Torres-Rovira et al [25] showed that the proportion of low birth weight in excessive backfat thickness sows was more than 20%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Additionally, Catalano et al [26] reported that obesity in pregnant women during later pregnancy also increased the incidence of stillbirth and neonatal death. Some studies have shown that the placental dysfunction may be a determinant of maternal obesity during pregnancy leading to abnormal fetal development [5,27,28]. In our previous study, we found that when sows had a backfat ≥ 21 mm at days 109 of gestation, the higher m 6 A modification shown in genes associated with placental development limits the development of placental vasculature, thereby increasing the incidence of low birth weight in piglets [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, mitochondrial dysfunction and over generation of superoxide could be part of a vicious cycle and can be considered as a potential mechanism of placental dysfunction involved in obese pregnancy. Although several studies reveal that excessive back-fat of sows is associated with placental dysfunction [4,16], it is not currently known whether increased back-fat is coupled with changes in mitochondrial structure and function in the pig placenta.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modern sow has been selected for large litter size and milk production. In addition, balanced nutrition, more standardized management and effective disease control were widely used in sow production [1,2]. E ciency of reproduction signi cantly increased in the breeding herd [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%