1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0965-8564(98)00016-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excess or wasteful commuting in a selection of British cities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
122
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
122
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They have been compared with observed commuting patterns to determine the 'efficiency' of trip making whereby any deviation from the costminimising solution is considered to be excessive (Murphy, 2009). Excess commuting is a term which refers to the empirical difference between the average minimum commute necessitated by the existing distribution of jobs and housing in urban areas and the observed commute (White, 1988;Frost et al, 1998;Horner, 2002;Loo and Chow, 2010;Murphy and Killen, 2011). The greater the deviation between observed commuting patterns and the minimum required by the morphology of jobs-housing arrangements, the more 'excessive' the observed commuting patterns are in urban areas.…”
Section: Urban Spatial Location Advantage: the Dual Of The Transportamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They have been compared with observed commuting patterns to determine the 'efficiency' of trip making whereby any deviation from the costminimising solution is considered to be excessive (Murphy, 2009). Excess commuting is a term which refers to the empirical difference between the average minimum commute necessitated by the existing distribution of jobs and housing in urban areas and the observed commute (White, 1988;Frost et al, 1998;Horner, 2002;Loo and Chow, 2010;Murphy and Killen, 2011). The greater the deviation between observed commuting patterns and the minimum required by the morphology of jobs-housing arrangements, the more 'excessive' the observed commuting patterns are in urban areas.…”
Section: Urban Spatial Location Advantage: the Dual Of The Transportamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other costs can be used including Euclidean distance and travel time which have been used in previous studies (see Horner, 2002;Merriman et al 1995); and also some generalised cost measure is possible although data availability is a major issue in this case. Intra-zonal travel distances were estimated by assuming that each zonal unit is approximately circular in shape (see Frost et al, 1998). In a similar manner to other studies, this study excluded those trips originating and destined for locations outside the study boundary (see Frost et al, 1998;Horner, 2002;Murphy, 2009).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the situation could be greatly improved by further diversifying the land functions, improving the jobs-housing balance and densifying public transport routes and networks. These indices were developed mainly as descriptive tools to compare urban areas in terms of commuting efficiency (Frost et al (1998) [36]; Horner (2002) [32]; Ma and Banister (2006) [37]), give evidence that how urban form and commuting behavior in a city are changing over time or where an urban area stands with respect to other cities.…”
Section: Excess Commutingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach assumes that each zone has a circular shape such that the average intrazonal travel distance can be estimated backwards 13 from the known zonal area. When assuming an equal distribution of trips across zones, this intrazonal travel distance equals the radius of a zone (Frost, et al, 1998;Horner, 2002):…”
Section: Travel Time Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%