1995
DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.1995.269.1.g34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excess nitric oxide does not cause cellular, vascular, or mucosal dysfunction in the cat small intestine

Abstract: The overproduction of nitric oxide in the small bowel has been invoked as a cytotoxic event in the vascular, mucosal, and whole organ dysfunction associated with inflammation. We assessed whether exogenous administration of nitric oxide in the form of nitric oxide donors (CAS 754, SIN-1) could cause microvascular and mucosal barrier dysfunction in vivo or epithelial and endothelial cell permeability alterations and cell injury in vitro. Increasing concentrations of CAS 754 or SIN-1 were infused locally into au… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The view that a drop in endothelial NO production promotes vascular permeability is further supported by the finding that oedema formation was attenuated if the PAF-induced decrease in endothelial NO levels was prevented by imipramine or dexamethasone. Other studies have reported that NO donors also reverse the PAF-induced protein clearance in the intestine [36].…”
Section: Role Of No In Paf-induced Oedema Formationmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The view that a drop in endothelial NO production promotes vascular permeability is further supported by the finding that oedema formation was attenuated if the PAF-induced decrease in endothelial NO levels was prevented by imipramine or dexamethasone. Other studies have reported that NO donors also reverse the PAF-induced protein clearance in the intestine [36].…”
Section: Role Of No In Paf-induced Oedema Formationmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…One possible explanation is that this differential regulation of NO represents another example of the frequently contrarian regulatory mechanisms of the systemic and the pulmonary circulation, for example high versus low arterial blood pressure or hypoxic dilatation versus hypoxic constriction. However, that would not explain why NO donors are protective against PAF-induced oedema in both the lungs [16] and the intestine [36]. Alternatively, these differences might be explained in terms of the bell-shaped dose-response curve of NO where either too little or too much NO increases vascular permeability.…”
Section: Role Of No In Paf-induced Oedema Formationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Our data show that inhaled NO had absolutely no effect upon the intact peripheral microvasculature or a microvasculature that had ample NO. On the other hand, in a reperfused tissue wherein endothelial NO can be reduced by as much as 90%, for example in the heart or mesentery (3,10,11), inhaled NO provided at least as much protection after ischemia/reperfusion of a distal vascular bed, as does bolus injection or superfusion of tissues with NO donors, however, without the associated hypotension (33,34). In fact, NO inhalation in a very stable and lasting manner returned blood flow to control levels and prevented all of the leukocyte emigration in the most effective way we have observed to date.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Although this has not yet been studied in detail, the gram-positive exotox-vascular and mucosal permeability or impair absorption and secretion in the small bowel. 31 However, whether NO donors ins appear to induce NOS expression with a similar, short-…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%