“…Although our results at T = 280.00 K and p = (1 and 5) MPa are smaller than the calculated values and deviate by a greater amount than the estimated uncertainties from the calculated constant pressure lines, our other results agree with the measurements by Dettmann et al and the calculated values within the estimated uncertainties. In the case of the a calibration, natural convection in the calorimeter, which is one of the means to satisfy conditions of the lumped system, might be weakened due to increase of water viscosity at T = 280 K. Figure 8 shows the comparison of the temperature dependence of our results for (methanol + water) at p = 5 MPa with the measurements by Dettmann et al [3]; m, Benson et al [4]; ,, Benson and D'Arcy [5]; ., Villamanan et al [6]; h, Zegers and Somsen [7]; j, Costas and Patterson [8]; }, Ogawa and Murakami [9]; r, Tanaka et al [10]; g, Lankford and Criss [11]; , Andreoli-Ball et al [12]; l, Okano et al [13]; ·, extrapolated values of Dettmann et al [14]; -, IUPAC EOS [15]. figure 8, the constant pressure lines at p = 5 MPa for water calculated by the IAPWS Formulation and for methanol by the IUPAC equation of state are also plotted.…”