1986
DOI: 10.1016/0378-3812(86)87045-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excess enthalpies and excess volumes of alkanol + n-heptane mixtures at high pressures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“… a Experimental data from refs have been used. A dash indicates that no experimental data were available in the literature. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… a Experimental data from refs have been used. A dash indicates that no experimental data were available in the literature. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… a For modeling, the binary dispersive parameters from Table were applied. Experimental data from refs have been used. A dash indicates that no experimental data were available in the literature. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although constant H-bond energy has been assumed for the sake of simplicity in various thermodynamic models of associated alcoholic solutions [22], it is well-known fact that cooperativity, that is non-additivity of energy, occurs when hydrogen-bonding functional groups with both donor and acceptor properties form continuous chains or cycles [21]. Similarly to the excess molar volume, the excess molar enthalpy decreases with increasing pressure [23,24]. Moreover, the compressibility of pure ethanol is not so sensitive to pressure as that of binary mixtures and pure n-heptane ( figure 6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VE as function of mole fraction x (alkanol) for 1-alkanol/ nonane mixtures according to eq 1 with parameters from Table III. He but also 1/E of alkanol/alkane mixtures (23,24) physical contribution arising from free volume effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%