2021
DOI: 10.1001/amajethics.2021.410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exceptionalism at the End of AIDS

Abstract: HIV/AIDS exceptionalism promoted compassion, garnered funding, built institutions, and shaped regulatory and research agendas under emergency conditions. Globally, however, HIV/AIDS exceptionalism has further fragmented fragile health service delivery systems in vulnerable, marginalized communities and created perverse incentives to influence seropositive individuals' behaviors. Even where HIV epidemics are viewed as "controlled" or "resolved" (as in the United States), ending AIDS requires eliminating excepti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, global ‘problem choice’ is the creation, definition, categorisation and pursuit of certain issues, specifically within a largely unequal global health field comprised of many Global North‐based institutions with particular aims and deliverables (Greene et al., 2013 , p. 34; see also Ziman, 1987 ). Of these priorities is the HIV epidemic, which has been a large focus of global health organisations, sometimes to the exclusion or deprioritisation of other health and disease burdens (Benton & Sangaramoorthy, 2021 ; Vijayakumar, 2021 ). Yet, less work has analysed how global problem choice and state‐level processes foster gaps in holistic health research and data collection, exacerbating medical uncertainty for people across various social identities and geopolitical locations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, global ‘problem choice’ is the creation, definition, categorisation and pursuit of certain issues, specifically within a largely unequal global health field comprised of many Global North‐based institutions with particular aims and deliverables (Greene et al., 2013 , p. 34; see also Ziman, 1987 ). Of these priorities is the HIV epidemic, which has been a large focus of global health organisations, sometimes to the exclusion or deprioritisation of other health and disease burdens (Benton & Sangaramoorthy, 2021 ; Vijayakumar, 2021 ). Yet, less work has analysed how global problem choice and state‐level processes foster gaps in holistic health research and data collection, exacerbating medical uncertainty for people across various social identities and geopolitical locations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%