Abstract:This report raises the possibility that the use of SDR could be expanded to include other pathologies. We discuss the case and the relevant literature. Our spasticity service at NUH has to date inserted 300 baclofen pumps and performed 60 SDRs mainly in children with cerebral palsy.
“… 7 Although CP diagnosis was one of the inclusion criteria of this review, SDR can also be indicated for patients with spasticity resulting from other diagnoses such as multiple sclerosis, Leigh syndrome, 25 stroke, 26 spinal cord injury 24 , and transverse myelitis. 27 …”
Objective: To identify selection criteria for selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) in cerebral
palsy, to analyze the instruments used for evaluation, and to describe the
characteristics of physical therapy in postoperative protocols.Data sources: Integrative review performed in the following databases: SciELO, PEDro, Cochrane
Library, and PubMed. The terms in both Portuguese and English for “cerebral
palsy”, “selective dorsal rhizotomy”, and “physical therapy” were used in the
search. Studies whose samples enrolled individuals with cerebral palsy who had
attended physical therapy sessions for selective dorsal rhizotomy according to
protocols and describing such protocols’ characteristics were included. Literature
reviews were excluded and there was no restriction as to period of
publication.Data synthesis: Eighteen papers were selected, most of them being prospective cohort studies with
eight-month to ten-year follow-ups. In most studies, the instruments of assessment
encompassed the domains of functions, body structure, and activity. The percentage
of posterior root sections was close to 50%. Primary indications for SDR included
ambulatory spastic diplegia, presence of spasticity that interfered with mobility,
good strength of lower limbs and trunk muscles, no musculoskeletal deformities,
dystonia, ataxia or athetosis, and good cognitive function. Postoperative physical
therapy is part of SDR treatment protocols and should be intensive and specific,
being given special emphasis in the first year.Conclusions: The studies underline the importance of appropriate patient selection to obatin
success in the SDR. Postoperative physical therapy should be intensive and
long-term, and must necessarily include strategies to modify the patient’s former
motor pattern.
“… 7 Although CP diagnosis was one of the inclusion criteria of this review, SDR can also be indicated for patients with spasticity resulting from other diagnoses such as multiple sclerosis, Leigh syndrome, 25 stroke, 26 spinal cord injury 24 , and transverse myelitis. 27 …”
Objective: To identify selection criteria for selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) in cerebral
palsy, to analyze the instruments used for evaluation, and to describe the
characteristics of physical therapy in postoperative protocols.Data sources: Integrative review performed in the following databases: SciELO, PEDro, Cochrane
Library, and PubMed. The terms in both Portuguese and English for “cerebral
palsy”, “selective dorsal rhizotomy”, and “physical therapy” were used in the
search. Studies whose samples enrolled individuals with cerebral palsy who had
attended physical therapy sessions for selective dorsal rhizotomy according to
protocols and describing such protocols’ characteristics were included. Literature
reviews were excluded and there was no restriction as to period of
publication.Data synthesis: Eighteen papers were selected, most of them being prospective cohort studies with
eight-month to ten-year follow-ups. In most studies, the instruments of assessment
encompassed the domains of functions, body structure, and activity. The percentage
of posterior root sections was close to 50%. Primary indications for SDR included
ambulatory spastic diplegia, presence of spasticity that interfered with mobility,
good strength of lower limbs and trunk muscles, no musculoskeletal deformities,
dystonia, ataxia or athetosis, and good cognitive function. Postoperative physical
therapy is part of SDR treatment protocols and should be intensive and specific,
being given special emphasis in the first year.Conclusions: The studies underline the importance of appropriate patient selection to obatin
success in the SDR. Postoperative physical therapy should be intensive and
long-term, and must necessarily include strategies to modify the patient’s former
motor pattern.
“…This treatment reduces the sensory input into spinal-motorneuron pools, reducing their excitability. 18 , 19 Orthopedic surgery (tendon lengthening, soft tissue release, and osteotomies) may be considered in patients with upper and lower limb spasticity after stroke, particularly for equinovarus foot deformity, improving kinetic and kinematic gait parameters. 20 However, further validation of surgical correction of spastic foot following stroke is desirable with higher level of study designs and validated assessment tools.…”
Section: Management Of Poststroke Spasticitymentioning
Spasticity is a common disabling symptom for several neurological conditions. Botulinum toxin type A injection represents the gold standard treatment for focal spasticity after stroke showing efficacy, reversibility, and low prevalence of complications. In recent years, incobotulinumtoxinA, a new Botulinum toxin type A free of complexing proteins, has been used for treating several movement disorders with safety and efficacy. IncobotulinumtoxinA is currently approved for treating spasticity of the upper limb in stroke survivors, even if several studies described the use also in lower limb muscles. In the present review article, we examine the safety and effectiveness of incobotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of spasticity after stroke.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.