1978
DOI: 10.2307/525939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excavations at Wakerley, Northants, 1972-75

Abstract: Department of the Environment revealed an extensive Iron Age settlement and traces of widespread Roman agricultural and industrial activity at Wakerley, Northamptonshire (FIG. 2). The settlement was situated in Wakerley parish, immediately to the south of the road running between the villages of Wakerley and Harringworth and nine miles north-northeast of Corby 3 (FIG. 3). It was sited on sloping ground, overlooking the valley of the River Welland, and some \ mile from the river itself. From the site there are … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Charcoal was relatively inexpensive and could often be produced locally, close to the site of industrial activity. Charcoal as a residue of pyrotechnical processes occurs widely in relevant archaeological contexts (for example from Iron Age and Roman deposits associated with iron smelting at Wakerley, Northamptonshire; Jackson et al 1978). Therefore, analysis of charcoal recovered from the archaeological record can be a useful tool for archaeologists to determine various types of human activity involving the use of fire for example metallurgical processes (Bayley et al 2001), glass production (Henderson 2000), pottery firing (Livingstone-Smith 2001) and domestic hearths (McDonnell 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Charcoal was relatively inexpensive and could often be produced locally, close to the site of industrial activity. Charcoal as a residue of pyrotechnical processes occurs widely in relevant archaeological contexts (for example from Iron Age and Roman deposits associated with iron smelting at Wakerley, Northamptonshire; Jackson et al 1978). Therefore, analysis of charcoal recovered from the archaeological record can be a useful tool for archaeologists to determine various types of human activity involving the use of fire for example metallurgical processes (Bayley et al 2001), glass production (Henderson 2000), pottery firing (Livingstone-Smith 2001) and domestic hearths (McDonnell 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar practice may be suggested by one of the furnaces investigated by Bridgewater (1965; Area A; Figs 2.2 and 2.3), although at the time the thickness of the clay was interpreted as possibly representing a reworking of an earlier feature. Comparable structures have also been recorded at other major ironworking centres such as those on the Weald and in Northamptonshire (Cleere 1970;Jackson and Ambrose 1978), all of which can be classified according to Cleere's typology as Group B slag tapping furnaces (Cleere 1976).…”
Section: Ironworking Structuresmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…2.5, 'furnace D'). A charcoal store has also been identified at Chesters (Fulford and Allen 1992), while ore roasting hearths have often been recorded, as at Bardown, on the Weald (Cleere 1976) and at Wakerley, Northamptonshire (Jackson and Ambrose 1978). Post and stake-holes have been recorded suggesting that timber-built structures were present (see Figs 2.5 and 2.11) probably providing shelter, storage and other ancillary functions but unfortunately none are reconstructable.…”
Section: Ironworking Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 353 RCHM 1975, 24; Johnston 1987; Jackson and Ambrose 1978; Jackson and Tylecote 1988; Condron 1997; Schrüfer-Kolb 1999 and 2004. See also Wacher 1986, 170.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%