1974
DOI: 10.2307/3888340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excavations at the Gordon's Bay Shell Midden, South-Western Cape

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Fig 3, the baboons do not fall on the same marine–terrestrial regression line as the humans; baboons are poorer in 15 N than we would predict humans with the same δ 13 C values to be. Considering trophic enrichment in nitrogen isotopes and the higher trophic levels of vertebrates, particularly in the marine environment [129,130] (Fig 2), baboons probably fall below the regression line because they do not include marine and terrestrial vertebrate tissues in their diets [10,11,13], as humans did [31,32,34,35]. Given the observed pattern, and its likely explanation, we maintain that δ 15 N values of humans and baboons are not directly comparable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As shown in Fig 3, the baboons do not fall on the same marine–terrestrial regression line as the humans; baboons are poorer in 15 N than we would predict humans with the same δ 13 C values to be. Considering trophic enrichment in nitrogen isotopes and the higher trophic levels of vertebrates, particularly in the marine environment [129,130] (Fig 2), baboons probably fall below the regression line because they do not include marine and terrestrial vertebrate tissues in their diets [10,11,13], as humans did [31,32,34,35]. Given the observed pattern, and its likely explanation, we maintain that δ 15 N values of humans and baboons are not directly comparable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence from food waste recovered through archaeological excavations provides a guide to the types of foods consumed, but differential preservation of hard and soft food remains makes it very difficult to quantify diets on this basis. Nonetheless, we know that shellfish, stranded marine mammals, fish, terrestrial vertebrates and edible plants were all important [3135]. In the south-western, winter rainfall region, there are clear distinctions between the δ 13 C values of marine and terrestrial foods, with the former significantly enriched in 13 C. There are also broad differences in the macronutrient composition of the foods, with marine foods generally higher in protein, whereas many terrestrial [plant] foods are richer in carbohydrates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite an extensive archaeological record from the Cape south coast, including bone tool technology demonstrated to date to 80 ka (Henshilwood et al 2001;Jacobs et al 2013), stingray spines have not been reported. A single spine, 7.5 cm in length, postulated to have been from an elephantfish (family Chimaeridae or Callorhynchidae) and used as an awl, was reported from a ~3.2 ka midden at Gordon's Bay (Van Noten 1974).…”
Section: Stingray Palaeontology and Archaeologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of those pictured by her feature a continuous incised groove running around the outside of the piece. Another 28 examples of these artefacts have been recovered from the early Holocene levels at the nearby site of Matjes River Shelter (Dreyer 1933;Louw 1960), while later Holocene examples have been found at sites throughout the Fynbos and Forest Biomes of the Cape (Goodwin 1938;van Noten 1974;Deacon et al 1978;Schweitzer 1979;Poggenpoel and Robertshaw 1981;Schweitzer and Wilson 1982). In Ethiopia, Brandt (1986) reports that two bone tubes were recovered from a cache which also contained over thirty pierced gastropod shells found close to an intentional burial at FeJx 2 at Lake Besaka dated to the LSA.…”
Section: Notched Bone Piece (A 'Bone Tube'?)mentioning
confidence: 99%