1992
DOI: 10.2307/529922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excavations at Opovo, 1985-1987: Socioeconomic Change in the Balkan Neolithic

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. This is the second preliminary report of excavations and analyses of Opovo-Ugar Bajbuk, a Neolithic settlement of the Vinta-Plocnik culture located in the lowerTamis' river val… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high oil content in flax seeds can make them more susceptible to burning and less likely to be preserved compared to other seeds (Wilson 1984) and so their presence even in small numbers could suggest flax cultivation for oil and/or fibre. This is further supported by the recovery of flax textile fragments from the contemporary late Neolithic site at Opovo in Serbia (4700-4500 cal BC) (Borojevi≤ 2006;Tringham et al 1992).…”
Section: Other Cropsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The high oil content in flax seeds can make them more susceptible to burning and less likely to be preserved compared to other seeds (Wilson 1984) and so their presence even in small numbers could suggest flax cultivation for oil and/or fibre. This is further supported by the recovery of flax textile fragments from the contemporary late Neolithic site at Opovo in Serbia (4700-4500 cal BC) (Borojevi≤ 2006;Tringham et al 1992).…”
Section: Other Cropsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The pithoi, with the exception of house 13, are located in the older part of the building, reflecting the control of storage by older members of the household. On the other hand, dissatisfaction and social tensions can be observed based on the location and So far Opovo is the only examined Vin≠a culture settlement where all three building horizons provide no clear evidence supporting the change from public to private storage (Tringham, Brukner and Voytek 1985;Tringham et al 1992). The reasons for this may lie in the economy of the settlement, which was based on wild rather than domesticated resources, while long-term storage of cereals was of less importance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for this may lie in the economy of the settlement, which was based on wild rather than domesticated resources, while long-term storage of cereals was of less importance. Opovo is located in a marshy environment which is not conducive to intensive agriculture; only small quantities of cereals were discovered even in structures resembling storage pits, while the houses contained insignificant evidence of cereal processing (Borojevi≤ 1998;Tringham et al 1992). Therefore, the lack of long term change in the character of grain storage can be interpreted as a result of the settlement's non-reliance on agriculture for survival; we can also accept that social status was achieved through the distribution of meat rather than the accumulation of grain (Russell 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main weakness of those investigations was publishing results without illustrated examples, sometimes only with schematized representations. It is the case with assemblages from Divostin (Tringham et al 1988: 210-221), Vinča-Belo Brdo (Voytek 1984:54-58), Selevac (Voytek 1990: 473-481), Gomolava (Kaczanowska & Kozłowski 1986: 115-119) and Opovo (Tringham et al 1985;Tringham et al 1992). It was not possible to compare the results of investigations of the assemblage from Vinča-Belo Brdo from the last series of excavations (1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007) with the already existing data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%