2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00531-019-01786-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examples of tectonic overprints of magnetic fabrics in rocks of the Bohemian Massif and Western Carpathians

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the value of corrected AMS degree (P j ) is relatively small (1.025 and 1.021 for the northern and southern limbs of folds, respectively), and AMS results display both oblate and prolate ellipsoids (Figures 3c, 3d, 3g, and 3h in Bian et al (2020)). These features are clearly inconsistent with stage 5 (strong cleavage) which are dominated by oblate ellipsoids and higher value of P j (Figure 2 in Hrouda & Chadima, 2020). The AMS deformed characteristics of the samples from Bian et al's (2020) Jingzhushan Formation red beds should belong to stage 2 (incipient deformation) to stage 4 (weak cleavage), which is also consistent with weak and moderate deformed magnetic fabrics (Weil & Yonkee, 2009).…”
Section: Inclination Shallowingmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, the value of corrected AMS degree (P j ) is relatively small (1.025 and 1.021 for the northern and southern limbs of folds, respectively), and AMS results display both oblate and prolate ellipsoids (Figures 3c, 3d, 3g, and 3h in Bian et al (2020)). These features are clearly inconsistent with stage 5 (strong cleavage) which are dominated by oblate ellipsoids and higher value of P j (Figure 2 in Hrouda & Chadima, 2020). The AMS deformed characteristics of the samples from Bian et al's (2020) Jingzhushan Formation red beds should belong to stage 2 (incipient deformation) to stage 4 (weak cleavage), which is also consistent with weak and moderate deformed magnetic fabrics (Weil & Yonkee, 2009).…”
Section: Inclination Shallowingmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…(2020)). These features are clearly inconsistent with stage 5 (strong cleavage) which are dominated by oblate ellipsoids and higher value of P j (Figure 2 in Hrouda & Chadima, 2020). The AMS deformed characteristics of the samples from Bian et al.’s (2020) Jingzhushan Formation red beds should belong to stage 2 (incipient deformation) to stage 4 (weak cleavage), which is also consistent with weak and moderate deformed magnetic fabrics (Weil & Yonkee, 2009).…”
Section: Cause Of Inclination Discrepancymentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The tensor defining AMS can be visualized as an ellipsoid where the orthogonal axes correspond to K max , K min , and K int , respectively (Tarling & Hrouda, 1993). In general, a close correspondence exists between the principal axes of magnetic susceptibility ellipsoid and that of strain ellipsoid (Figure 1), showing coaxial and a certain quantitative relationship in size (Almqvist, Hirt, Schmidt, & Dietrich, 2009;Borradaile & Tarling, 1981;Hrouda, 1982;Hrouda & Chadima, 2019; J. X. Li et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…As the AMS analysis shown in Figure 3 of Bian et al (2020), the K min axes of the southern limb are distributed along an embryonic girdle that is parallel to the shortening, while the K max axes of the northern limb remain perpendicular to the shortening and the K min axes conspicuously extend along the direction that is parallel to the slaty cleavage. The deformation of rocks can be progressively classified into 6° referring to different AMS results (Hrouda & Chadima, 2020;Parés, 2015). Accordingly, the magnetic fabrics shown in Bian et al (2020) display characteristics of deformation degree 3 (pencil structure) to degree 5 (strong cleavage), which are determined by the competition of the layer parallel shearing ZHAO ET AL.…”
Section: Penetrative Strainmentioning
confidence: 99%