1996
DOI: 10.1016/0034-4877(96)84069-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examples of gauge conservation laws in nonholonomic systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
75
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
75
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast with the general case, this case is completely and explicitly solvable, as it is well known, see, e.g., [4,8,32,33]. However, we will give an independent treatment.…”
Section: Ball Rolling On the Interior Of A Cylindermentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast with the general case, this case is completely and explicitly solvable, as it is well known, see, e.g., [4,8,32,33]. However, we will give an independent treatment.…”
Section: Ball Rolling On the Interior Of A Cylindermentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For example, to what extent the mentioned Poisson structures can be useful to investigate the intimate nature of these and maybe other non-holonomic systems, for example in order to characterize their integrability properties [3,21,22]; see also the recent work [23]. Another question could be to clarify the origin of the system of differential equations giving the conservation laws for the mentioned reduced non-holonomic systems, see also [4,10,19,32,40] and references therein.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Here the constraint distribution does have length 1 everywhere, however, after performing the appropriate computations, we obtain β = − y 1 + y 2 dy, which is clearly exact: β = df , with f = 1 2 ln 1 1 + y 2 . Then, k = 1 1 + y 2 and the invariant measure defined by k ω n leads, using Euler's integrating factor technique, to the constant of the motion ϕ =ẋ 1 + y 2 which was also obtained by different methods in [4,7,13].…”
Section: A Counter Examplementioning
confidence: 99%