2007
DOI: 10.2514/1.28561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Example Impact of Nonuniform Acceleration Fields on Liquids in Spacecraft

Abstract: Nomenclature a= steady acceleration f = liquid fill fraction M = mass of a nearby spacecraft B = Bond number B gg = ratio of gravity-gradient and capillary effects B ng = ratio of nearby-spacecraft and capillary effects B sg = ratio of self-gravitation and capillary effects G = universal gravitational constant, 6:6742 10 11 m 3 kg 1 s 2 . P a = pressure difference due to acceleration P c = pressure difference due to capillary effects P ng = pressure difference due to a nearby spacecraft P gg = pressure differe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the MA7 container, the torus-shaped bubble is confined between the standpipe and spherical tank walls due only to wetting, geometry, and fill fraction, whereas in the Gravity Probe B tank, the torus-shaped ullage is also impacted by the added complexity of centripetal acceleration. Collicott [13] identifies asymmetric interface configurations in a spherical tank with a central vane structure for a specific range of fill fractions when g 0.…”
Section: Deeper Numerical Study Of a Generalized Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the MA7 container, the torus-shaped bubble is confined between the standpipe and spherical tank walls due only to wetting, geometry, and fill fraction, whereas in the Gravity Probe B tank, the torus-shaped ullage is also impacted by the added complexity of centripetal acceleration. Collicott [13] identifies asymmetric interface configurations in a spherical tank with a central vane structure for a specific range of fill fractions when g 0.…”
Section: Deeper Numerical Study Of a Generalized Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%