2014
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2014.2305652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Example-Based Super-Resolution Land Cover Mapping Using Support Vector Regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the past decades, many SRM methods have been proposed. These methods involve the pixel swapping algorithm [7,13], Hopfield neural networks [14][15][16], subpixel/pixel spatial attraction models [17][18][19], Markov random fields [20][21][22][23], the geometric methods [24,25], geostatistical methods [26][27][28], artificial intelligence-based algorithms [29][30][31][32][33] and interpolation-based methods [34][35][36]. These methods have obtained acceptable performances in various applications, such as urban tree identification [37], urban building extraction [38], floodplain inundation mapping [39,40] and land use mapping [41].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decades, many SRM methods have been proposed. These methods involve the pixel swapping algorithm [7,13], Hopfield neural networks [14][15][16], subpixel/pixel spatial attraction models [17][18][19], Markov random fields [20][21][22][23], the geometric methods [24,25], geostatistical methods [26][27][28], artificial intelligence-based algorithms [29][30][31][32][33] and interpolation-based methods [34][35][36]. These methods have obtained acceptable performances in various applications, such as urban tree identification [37], urban building extraction [38], floodplain inundation mapping [39,40] and land use mapping [41].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, a sub-image, rather than the entire hyperspectral image, is fed to the 3D-FCNN. Specifically, as shown in Table 1, the input is restricted as a 33 33 1 c × × × -pixel sub-image cube, where 33 33 × is spatial dimensions, c is the special dimension depending on the sensor properties, and the color channel is set as 1 for HSIs. Therefore, all the filers in the successive convolution layers are designed to learn spectral information from c contiguous spectral bands.…”
Section: The Architecture Of the Proposed 3d-fcnnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, sub-pixel mapping (SPM) techniques, which predict the location of land cover classes within a coarse pixel (mixed pixel) [19,20], have also been proposed to generate a high-resolution classification map using fractional abundance images. Various methods based on linear optimization technique [21], pixel/sub-pixel spatial attraction model [22], pixel swapping algorithm [23], maximum a posteriori (MAP) model [24,25], Markov random field (MRF) [26,27], artificial neural network (ANN) [28][29][30], simulated annealing [31], total variant model [32], support vector regression [33], and collaborative representation [34] are proposed. In general, sub-pixel based analysis only overcomes the limitation in spatial-resolution for certain applications, e.g., classification and target detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the spatial model term, the spatial dependence model that aims to make the fine spatial resolution land cover map have the maximal spatial dependence is widely used [19,22,34,56]. The spatial model can also be constructed through the incorporation of information provided by additional dataset [57,58], or learned from the training image [59][60][61]. A comprehensive review of these models is beyond the scope of this paper, and more information can be found in relative literatures.…”
Section: Sub-pixel Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%