Examining workplace deviance in public sector organizations of Pakistan

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to pin point the root causes for the deviant workplace behaviour in the government sector of Pakistan.Design/methodology/approachData collection for the research was carried out by interviewing and distributing questionnaires to 100 employees belonging to different Government organizations of Pakistan. The extent of researcher interference was minimal and research was conducted in a non‐contrived environment. This is a cross‐sectional study.FindingsAfter a comprehensive study, it is concluded that there can be multiple factors responsible for creating workplace deviance, e.g. financial pressures, lower job satisfaction, organizational injustice, organization environment, employee perception, etc. but the most important factors out of these are organizational injustice and job satisfaction.Research limitations/implicationsAn important limitation of this research is that it was conducted with a limited sample and a small sample size. Future researchers should use a larger sample size for the research in order to explore new dimensions regarding workplace deviance in public sector organizations of Pakistan.Practical implicationsManagers can benefit from this research and can devise more appropriate strategies to make the employees productive. In order to overcome the deviant workplace behaviour, the managers should try to develop good employee relations, a congenial work environment and promote a culture of quality control circles.Originality/valueThe exact reasons for deviant behaviour in public sector organizations in Pakistan were not identified, thus solutions could not be formulated. This research pin points two major factors due to which deviation at work takes place. This paper is of paramount significance for managers experiencing employee deviance at work in government organizations of Pakistan.

Can Emotional Stability Buffer the Effect of Job Stress on Deviant Behavior?

“…An organization's performance and well-being have been negatively affected by WDB (Resick et al, 2013;Tuna et al, 2016). Other negative consequences include high production costs, inconsistent service quality and pricing, poor service reputation and loss of revenue and profits, (Biron, 2010;Nasir and Bashir, 2012). Besides, the physical and mental health of victims of WDB are affected (Nielsen and Knardahl, 2015).…”

Effect of ethical leadership and climate on effectiveness

“…Continuous ethical misconduct in today's world of work results in astronomic financial losses to organisations on an annual basis (Nasir & Bashir, 2012;Van Zyl, 2012). Dysfunctional consequences of unethical and counterproductive work behaviour consequently raise questions about why deviant behaviour occurs in organisations and what role effective organisational leaders can play in managing this behaviour.…”

Potential Causes and Outcomes of Communication Conflicts at the Workplace -A Qualitative Study in Pakistan

“…Employees should try to understand the common causes of employee conflicts so that a solution is found before the issues become unmanageable and entails into an irreparable loss. There has also been a significant rise in the communication conflicts among employees at the workplaces in Pakistan (Mansoor, Fida, Nasir, & Ahmad, 2011;Nasir & Bashir, 2012;Noor & Maad, 2009). The irony of the fact is that these conflicts are widely hidden and avoided instead of resolving them effectively (Chaudhry, 2011;Farooqi, 2013).…”