2019
DOI: 10.15358/2511-8676-2019-3-111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining User Experience of Conversational Agents in Hedonic Digital Services – Antecedents and the Role of Psychological Ownership

Abstract: Conversational agents (CA) that interact with users in human language have become increasingly popular over the past years. This study explores antecedents of the user experience with CAs in hedonic digital services, utilizing the example of music streaming services. Moreover, this study investigates whether a positive CA user experience increases users’ sense of psychological ownership towards the service, which in turn is supposed to positively influence users’ intention to use the service’s fee required pre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
(149 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chatbots do not often meet the expectations of customers due to the misunderstanding of input (Sheehan, Jin & Gottlieb, 2020; Danckwerts, Meißner & Krampe, 2019) or due to perceived risk of using them (Trivedi, 2019) Meißner & Krampe, 2019) and tend to communicate artificially due to their reliance on the programmed scripts . Conversely, some customers feel uncomfortable exchanging personal information with chatbots (Luo et al, 2019;Danckwerts, Meißner & Krampe, 2019) and this sense of distancing challenges the use of chatbots. This is further amplified by the allegedly strong personal relationships observed between small family businesses and their customers (Johnson, Herrmann & Huber, 2006;Rust, Zeithaml & Lemon, 2000;Price and Arnould, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chatbots do not often meet the expectations of customers due to the misunderstanding of input (Sheehan, Jin & Gottlieb, 2020; Danckwerts, Meißner & Krampe, 2019) or due to perceived risk of using them (Trivedi, 2019) Meißner & Krampe, 2019) and tend to communicate artificially due to their reliance on the programmed scripts . Conversely, some customers feel uncomfortable exchanging personal information with chatbots (Luo et al, 2019;Danckwerts, Meißner & Krampe, 2019) and this sense of distancing challenges the use of chatbots. This is further amplified by the allegedly strong personal relationships observed between small family businesses and their customers (Johnson, Herrmann & Huber, 2006;Rust, Zeithaml & Lemon, 2000;Price and Arnould, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Personalization is a key factor eliciting trust, feelings of familiarity and adoption of technologies ( 47 ) and in turn positively influences the user experience ( 48 ). Efforts were therefore put into giving user choice and autonomy as far as possible throughout the experience, and using non-forceful language in line with self-determination theory and motivational interviewing ( 49 – 51 ).…”
Section: Intervention Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… is the characteristic function of Levi's probability density function [14]. Therefore, the basic solution of the multi-dimensional fractional time-space diffusion equation can be constructed using the probability density function of Levi's steady-state statistical distribution.…”
Section: Case Of 2 S mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The one-dimensional Levitic distribution is the kernel function of the basic solution of the fractional fast diffusion model of the one-dimensional problem. The steadystate statistical distribution of Levi is two special cases of the basic solution kernel function of the classical diffusion equation and the spatial fractional diffusion equation[14]. Therefore, the basic solution of the multi-dimensional fractional time-space diffusion equation can be constructed using the probability density function of Levi's steady-state statistical distribution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%