2024
DOI: 10.3390/children11030361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining the Utility of the Early Childhood Development Index (ECDI) among Children in the Nigeria Context

Ngozi V. Enelamah,
Smitha Rao,
Margaret Lombe
et al.

Abstract: An estimated 6 million children under the age of five in Nigeria (out of nearly 31 million) risk not reaching their full developmental potential. The dearth of context-relevant measures poses a challenge to the planning and implementation of effective interventions. This study assesses the utility of the Early Childhood Development Index (ECDI) in Nigeria. We used the Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys to track progress among 3- to 4-year-old children (n = 11,073); 3-year-old, 51%; female, 49%. Using random ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To gain a better understanding of existing gaps not only on children’s developmental and educational status but also on ECCE service quality, effective data collection and monitoring is essential [ 14 ]. However, many of the existing assessment and monitoring tools are developed in Western, Educated, Industrialised, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) contexts, which are not necessarily culturally or contextually relevant or applicable in LMICs [ 15 ]. Considering the aforementioned concerns, this timely Special Issue addresses the gaps and challenges prevalent in LMICs and contributes to paving the way forward in supporting and promoting equity in access to quality education for all.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To gain a better understanding of existing gaps not only on children’s developmental and educational status but also on ECCE service quality, effective data collection and monitoring is essential [ 14 ]. However, many of the existing assessment and monitoring tools are developed in Western, Educated, Industrialised, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) contexts, which are not necessarily culturally or contextually relevant or applicable in LMICs [ 15 ]. Considering the aforementioned concerns, this timely Special Issue addresses the gaps and challenges prevalent in LMICs and contributes to paving the way forward in supporting and promoting equity in access to quality education for all.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%