2020
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-93108/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining the Prognostic Utility of Frailty for Post-arrest Outcomes Following the Provision of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocol

Abstract: BackgroundAdvanced knowledge of patient prognosis following a cardiac arrest is necessary to determine if resuscitation efforts are futile and ensure value-congruent care. Prior reviews have identified the prognostic factors associated with survival and recovery following cardiac arrest. However, few studies to date have examined the prognostic value of frailty in predicting post-arrest outcomes. The objective of this systematic review is to synthesize the available evidence reporting the association between f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This hypothesis is di cult to con rm in view of the various different screening tools utilised for frailty. [7] Limitations of this study include the small population, although exhaustive of the CPRs performed on the Maltese Islands in 2019, which was further hindered by incomplete data in the 25 patients mentioned above and lack of accessibility to deceased patient's information. The latter meant that the Clinical Frailty Score could not be calculated, as this score would require knowledge regarding patient's independence, besides comorbidities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This hypothesis is di cult to con rm in view of the various different screening tools utilised for frailty. [7] Limitations of this study include the small population, although exhaustive of the CPRs performed on the Maltese Islands in 2019, which was further hindered by incomplete data in the 25 patients mentioned above and lack of accessibility to deceased patient's information. The latter meant that the Clinical Frailty Score could not be calculated, as this score would require knowledge regarding patient's independence, besides comorbidities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%