Examining the Mediating Effects of Social Learning on the Low Self-Control—Cyberbullying Relationship in a Youth Sample

Li, Carrie K. W.; Holt, Thomas J.; Bossler, Adam M.; May, David C.

doi:10.1080/01639625.2014.1004023

Cited by 65 publications

(47 citation statements)

References 48 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Personal propensities have also been considered one of the important predictors for OBP. In terms of morality, for instance, prior research found that moral disengagement was positively associated with OBP (Bussey, Fitzpatrick, & Raman, 2015; Menesini, Nocentini, & Camodeca, 2013; Robson & Witenberg, 2013), while moral emotions and values were negatively related to OBP (Li, Holt, Bossler, & May, 2016; Perren & Gutzwiller-Helfenfinger, 2012). In addition, it is also suggested that moral identity could buffer effects of trait anger on cyberbullying (Wang, Yang, Yang, Wang, & Lei, 2017).…”

Section: Motivations and Propensities For Obpmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For self-control, literature shows that low self-control is consistently associated with cyberbullying or online harassment (Donner, Marcum, Jennings, Higgins, & Banfield, 2014; Holt, Bossler, & May, 2012; Li et al, 2016; Lianos & McGrath, 2018; Marcum et al, 2014; Vazsonyi, Machackova, Sevcikova, Smahel, & Cerna, 2012). Kim, Song, and Jennings (2017) also found that low self-control was one of the significant predictors for cyberbullying over time among South Korean juveniles.…”

Section: Motivations and Propensities For Obpmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Motivations, Propensities, and Their Interplays on Online Bullying Perpetration: A Partial Test of Situational Action Theory

Song

Lee

2019

Crime & Delinquency

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Using data gathered from 757 college students in South Korea, the current study examines applicability of situational action theory (SAT) to online bullying perpetration (OBP). Specifically, the current study focuses on testing interplays between motivations in the criminogenic online setting (temptation and provocation) and individual propensities (morality and self-control) as well as interplay between two individual propensities on OBP. Results show that morality significantly buffers the effects of provocation on OBP as expected, while morality unexpectedly enhances effects of temptation on OBP. Moreover, the current study found no significant interaction between two propensities, morality and self-control. Thus, future studies should focus on examining how roles of morality vary depending on different types of offenses and contexts.

show abstract

Section: Motivations and Propensities For Obpmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Motivations and Propensities For Obpmentioning

confidence: 99%

Motivations, Propensities, and Their Interplays on Online Bullying Perpetration: A Partial Test of Situational Action Theory

Song

Lee

2019

Crime & Delinquency

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Running head: School-bullying and Cyber-bullying effects of low self-control behaviour; such as for perpetration low self-control shows a moderate effect on offline bullying perpetration, which is linked to CB perpetration, but for victimisation the effect appears weaker. Likewise, Marcum, Higgins, Freiburger and Ricketts (2014) concluded that both males and females with lower levels of self-control are more likely to participate in CB by posting hurtful messages or pictures to Facebook, implying that low self-control is a significant predictor for CB perpetration (Li, Holt, Bossler & May, 2016;You & Lim, 2016).…”

Section: Have Demonstrated Indirectmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparing factors related to school-bullying and cyber-bullying

Tzani

Ιωάννου

Synnott

et al. 2018

Crime Psychology Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: To present a comparative summary of literature of the risk and preventative factors related to school bullying (SB) and cyber-bullying (CB), while identifying research gaps.Background: Literature on bullying appears to disagree whether CB should be considered as a different form of bullying or as a subtype of SB. Researchers, in an attempt to understand bullying, examined in depth numerous risk and preventive factors.Methods: Based solely on previous research papers, fourteen risk and preventative factors related to SB and likewise to CB, were selected on the basis that are most commonly indicated as strong factors in preceding works; each factor was searched for in relation to SB and CB separately, allowing a comparison of how each factor relates to SB and likewise to CB.Conclusions: Findings present a comparative picture of the factors related to SB and CB and provide a direction in the area of factors for fellow researchers wishing to develop antibullying strategies in the future. As expected the present study found that some factors are similarly related to SB as to CB, and others differentiate. Details of findings, limitations and implications are further discussed.

show abstract

“…Despite the differences between these theories, both have received substantial empirical support to account for various forms of delinquency (Pratt & Cullen, 2000; Pratt et al, 2010; Vazsonyi, Mikuška, & Kelley, 2017), and cybercrimes, or offenses performed through Internet-connected devices (Holt, Bossler, & May, 2012; Holt, Burruss, & Bossler, 2010; Li, Holt, Bossler, & May, 2016; Marcum, Higgins, & Nicholson, 2017; Marcum, Higgins, Ricketts, & Wolfe, 2014). These studies also demonstrate that both self-control and deviant peer associations must be present in theoretical models to fully account for their dynamic relationships (Holt et al, 2012; Li et al, 2016; Marcum et al, 2017; Pratt & Cullen, 2000). At the same time, offenses enabled by technology present a unique challenge to our understanding of the general theory of crime, as the ubiquity of technology and access to information make opportunities to offend constant (Holt & Bossler, 2016).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring the Moderating Role of Gender in Juvenile Hacking Behaviors

Holt

Navarro

Clevenger

2019

Crime & Delinquency

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Criminological research has demonstrated the significant relationship between deviant peer associations, a lack of self-control, and individual delinquency. These relationships also account for involvement in cybercrime, though these results are based largely on adult samples. There is less research considering juvenile offending online, particularly examining involvement in property-based offenses such as computer hacking. This study utilized an international sample of 48,327 juvenile respondents in the Second International Self-Report of Delinquency (ISRD-2) study to examine the role of gender as a moderating factor in the relationship between deviant peer associations, self-control, opportunity, and self-reported computer hacking behavior. The findings demonstrated different correlates associated with hacking for males and females, as well as differences on the basis of urban and rural residency.

show abstract

Examining the Mediating Effects of Social Learning on the Low Self-Control—Cyberbullying Relationship in a Youth Sample

Cited by 65 publications

References 48 publications

Motivations, Propensities, and Their Interplays on Online Bullying Perpetration: A Partial Test of Situational Action Theory

Motivations, Propensities, and Their Interplays on Online Bullying Perpetration: A Partial Test of Situational Action Theory

Comparing factors related to school-bullying and cyber-bullying

Exploring the Moderating Role of Gender in Juvenile Hacking Behaviors

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About