2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining the level and distribution of catastrophic health expenditure from 2013 to 2018: A province-level study in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar findings were observed inthe National Health Services Survey (NHSS) conducted in 2013, 2018 to determine the incidence of CHE among poorer households, elderly persons, and individuals who visit private health clinics for treatment 22 . Similarly, in 2013 and 2018, a study in China using the National Health Services Survey (NHSS) revealed that the incidence of CHE in urban areas was 27.50%(2013) and 34.52%(2018) and that in rural areas was 21.72%(2013) and 35.89%(2018) 23 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar findings were observed inthe National Health Services Survey (NHSS) conducted in 2013, 2018 to determine the incidence of CHE among poorer households, elderly persons, and individuals who visit private health clinics for treatment 22 . Similarly, in 2013 and 2018, a study in China using the National Health Services Survey (NHSS) revealed that the incidence of CHE in urban areas was 27.50%(2013) and 34.52%(2018) and that in rural areas was 21.72%(2013) and 35.89%(2018) 23 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, only approximately 12% of the households had health insurance, there was a statistically significant difference in the average median cost amongsocioeconomic classes.A study showed that households with a low socioeconomic status had a greater proportion of OOPEsand that insurance reduces the risk of catastrophic health expenditures 23 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%