2018
DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acy043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining the Latent Structure of the Delis–Kaplan Executive Function System

Abstract: Results supported a three-factor D-KEFS model (i.e., inhibition, shifting, and fluency), although shifting and fluency were highly related (r = 0.696). The bifactor showed superior fit, but converged less often than other models. Shifting best predicted tests of reasoning, abstraction, and problem solving. These findings support the validity of D-KEFS scores for measuring executive-related constructs and provide a framework through which clinicians can interpret D-KEFS results.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is surprising because the literature on adults with AN consistently reported poor set-shifting in adults with AN (Smith et al, 2018) and the literature on adolescents with AN mostly showed no set-shifting difficulties (Lang et al, 2014). However, we suggested that superior inhibition abilities in adolescents with AN may compensate for their poor set-shifting abilities, because a) set-shifting tasks often include inhibition components as indicated by studies finding correlations between set-shifting and inhibition abilities (Karr et al, 2018;Koch et al, 2010;Miyake et al, 2000) and b) studies reported improved inhibition abilities in adolescents with AN (Weinbach et al, 2017;Wierenga et al, 2014). If superior inhibition abilities compensate for poor set-shifting in adolescents with AN, then controlling for inhibition abilities while assessing set-shifting might reveal set-shifting difficulties in these patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…This is surprising because the literature on adults with AN consistently reported poor set-shifting in adults with AN (Smith et al, 2018) and the literature on adolescents with AN mostly showed no set-shifting difficulties (Lang et al, 2014). However, we suggested that superior inhibition abilities in adolescents with AN may compensate for their poor set-shifting abilities, because a) set-shifting tasks often include inhibition components as indicated by studies finding correlations between set-shifting and inhibition abilities (Karr et al, 2018;Koch et al, 2010;Miyake et al, 2000) and b) studies reported improved inhibition abilities in adolescents with AN (Weinbach et al, 2017;Wierenga et al, 2014). If superior inhibition abilities compensate for poor set-shifting in adolescents with AN, then controlling for inhibition abilities while assessing set-shifting might reveal set-shifting difficulties in these patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In general, overall results suggest that most of the test measures possess adequate reliabilities regardless of age groups 44 . D-KEFS tests show a normal distribution in healthy subjects 41,56 and the result relates to brain morphology changes 57,58 within networks involved in EF 7 .…”
Section: Test Material In the Present Study We Used Tests From Two Tmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Prior reports have used different criteria to determine the number of factors to retain. For example, Latzman and Markon (2010) used eigenvalue-based methods, while Karr, Hofer, et al (2019) use fit indices. Although there is no way of knowing the actual number of factors generating empirical data, simulations can provide examples with known answers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Karr, Hofer, Iverson, and Garcia-Barrera (2019) compared several alternative models of the D-KEFS standardization data. The Twenty Questions, Word Context, and Proverbs Tests were not included in the measurement models but were used to evaluate prediction of criterion measures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%