Examining the key influencing factors on college students’ higher-order thinking skills in the smart classroom environment

Abstract

To understand the development of students’ higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) in the smart classroom environment, a structural equation modeling analysis was used to examine the relationships between key factors that influence students’ learning and their HOTS within a smart classroom environment. A sample of 217 first-year Chinese college students, who studied in a smart classroom environment for one semester, completed a survey that measures their smart classroom preferences, learning motivation, learning strategy, peer interaction, and HOTS. The results indicated that peer interaction and learning motivation had a direct impact on students’ HOTS. Furthermore, indirect effects were found between students’ learning strategy and HOTS through the mediator peer interaction, and between smart classroom preferences and HOTS through the following: learning motivation, the combination of learning strategy and peer interaction, and the combination of learning motivation, learning strategy and peer interaction. Based on these findings, this study recommends that instructors teaching in a smart learning environment should focus on improving peer interaction and learning motivation, as well as smart classroom preferences and learning strategy, to hone students’ HOTS.

Digital higher education: a divider or bridge builder? Leadership perspectives on edtech in a COVID-19 reality

“…Indeed, research shows that the use of edtech can enhance learning motivation and engagement (Jones, 2020), self-regulated learning (Broadbent et al, 2020), and knowledge transfer (Dohn et al, 2020). Beyond learner enjoyment and cognitive skills, edtech has also shown promise in terms of promoting critical thinking skills, sociocultural learning, student engagement, and learner creativity (Bishop et al, 2020;Lu et al, 2021).…”

Areas of Improvement of Organization and Research of Educational Management Problems

“…To the author's mind, insufficient attention was paid to the technological component of the research methodology and consideration of its specifics in relation to the features of the specialty. This is confirmed by the analysis of more than 50 domestic educational and methodological publications on the methodology of scientific research (Lu et al, 2021), which are mostly devoted to the disclosure of the philosophical foundations of cognitive activity; defining the principles, levels, functions, objectives of research methodology, the importance of ethical principles and culture of the researcher; disclosure of the creative essence of scientific research, the essence of the scientific apparatus; outlining the general principles of organization of scientific research, testing, and implementation of the results, requirements for registration, defense of dissertations, etc. Much attention is usually paid to the consideration of general scientific logical methods and techniques of cognition, as well as empirical research methods.…”

Fostering post-secondary vocational students’ critical thinking through multi-level tasks in learning environments

“…The results obtained from the present study might have implications for institutions planning to apply analysis and reflections on sundry thought-provoking texts along with spoken interactions to cultivate learners' critical thinking abilities. With regard to the aspect of cooperation, a structural equation modelling analysis (Lu et al, 2021) proved that, inter alia, students' peer interactions had a direct impact on college students' higher-order thinking skills. Nonetheless, interpreting results of her study involving undergraduate students in computer-mediated communication via blogging and face-to-face interaction modalities, Lee (2011) judged that asynchronous communication emerged to be favourable for improving participants' critical thinking abilities due to the provision of more time to reflect on their ideas.…”