Examining the Interplay of Sovereignty and Supranationalist Ideas in International Law

Abstract

Objective: The complex relationship between sovereignty and supranationalist conceptions is investigated in the context of international law. Since they coexist, intricate relationships have developed, which impact the global legal order. In an increasingly interconnected and transnationally challenging world, this research emphasizes the need of grasping this dynamic. The potential of this research to resolve the conflict between national sovereignty and cooperation on global issues gives it great significance. The research sheds light on how to tackle global issues like climate change, human rights breaches, and cross-border economic conflicts by examining the theoretical limits and practical ramifications of supranationalist initiatives.
 
 Method: This paper proposes a multidisciplinary method for analysing Jurisprudential Discourse Network Analysis (JDNA) of International Agreements. This method offers a holistic comprehension of the diverse character of sovereignty and supranationalism by integrating legal analysis, political theory, and international relations. This research has wide-ranging practical implications, which are not limited to the development of international treaties and accords and the reform of global institutions. Finding areas of agreement and common interests aids in diplomatic negotiations and promotes global collaboration.
 
 Result: This analysis uses modern facilities computer models to simulate a number of situations that illustrate the relationship between sovereignty and supranationalism in concrete settings.
 
 Conclusion: A framework for evaluating the outcomes of the offered methods and extracting useful information from the data is provided by the Node Metrics and Edge Metrics parameters. These settings can be modified and fine-tuned according to the needs of a certain study and the information at hand.