2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11145-016-9687-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining the independent contribution of prosodic sensitivity to word reading and spelling in early readers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(56 reference statements)
6
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In one, modelling pointed to direct relations to word reading for morphological awareness, but not prosodic sensitivity (Holliman et al, 2014). In a second, there were direct effects of each of prosodic sensitivity and morphological awareness to word reading, after controlling for phonological awareness and vocabulary (Holliman et al, 2017). Results from these studies with young readers point to potential direct relations for morphological awareness with word reading, with mixed evidence for prosodic sensitivity.…”
Section: Morphological Awareness and Prosodic Sensitivity In Readingmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In one, modelling pointed to direct relations to word reading for morphological awareness, but not prosodic sensitivity (Holliman et al, 2014). In a second, there were direct effects of each of prosodic sensitivity and morphological awareness to word reading, after controlling for phonological awareness and vocabulary (Holliman et al, 2017). Results from these studies with young readers point to potential direct relations for morphological awareness with word reading, with mixed evidence for prosodic sensitivity.…”
Section: Morphological Awareness and Prosodic Sensitivity In Readingmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…There were 15 items on each subtest 1 . Based on prior theorizing (Holliman, 2016) and research (e.g., Holliman et al, 2017), performance was pooled into a global measure of prosodic sensitivity. The measure as a whole had a somewhat low reliability of .63; removal of 8 items increased reliability to .70, which is adequate when assessing novel and complex constructs (e.g., Field, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Book' as 'dee DEEdee DEE'), thereby requiring participants to make judgments on the gross intonation contour or stress patterns of the items (Clin, Wade-Woolley, & Heggie, 2009;Goswami, Gerson, & Astruc, 2010;Holliman, Critten, et al, 2014;Holliman, Gutiérrez Palma, et al, 2016;Holliman, Williams, et al, 2014;Whalley & Hansen, 2006;Wood & Terrell, 1998). Other studies have exploited differences in stress patterns in phrases and compound nouns (Whalley & Hansen, 2006) or asked participants to produce or make judgments on items that contain stress-shifting suffixes (Clin et al, 2009;Jarmulowicz, Hay, Taran, & Ethington, 2008;Jarmulowicz, Taran, & Hay, 2007;Wade-Woolley & Heggie, 2014).…”
Section: Metalinguistic Skills Associated With Multisyllabic Word Reamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been proposed that early sensitivity to speech rhythm cues may contribute to the development of phonological representations [25]. However, sensitivity to speech rhythm cues still explains unique variance in word reading skills after controlling for phonological processing skills (e.g., [61]), thus suggesting that it also makes a significant contribution to reading development independently of phonological awareness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%