2009
DOI: 10.1080/08995600802565751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining the Impact of Training on the Homosexual Conduct Policy for Military Personnel

Abstract: The impact of training related to the Don't Ask, Don't Tell, Don't Pursue policy on training outcomes of military personnel was examined with data from the Department of Defense Inspector General's Don't Ask, Don't Tell, Don't Pursue Policy Survey of military personnel (N = 71,570). We hypothesized that training related to the Don't Ask, Don't Tell, Don't Pursue policy would impact participant's reactions, learning and cognitive outcomes, and behavioral and organizational outcomes. Results indicate that indivi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The trainee knowledge measures employ a variety of response formats (true/false, multiple choice, Likert scale), from five to 40 items, and all address one or more of the following topics: SH definitions, law, the organization's policies and practices, and the causes and consequences of SH. Across studies employing a variety of measures, instructional methods (e.g., lecture, discussion, and case study), and instructional media (e.g., online, video, and “live”), SH training has consistently shown to have a significant positive impact on trainees' acquisition of knowledge related to SH (e.g., Bingham & Scherer, ; Campbell et al, ; Estrada & Laurence, ). There are some exceptions to this clear pattern (Magley et al, , Study 1; Pilgram & Keyton, ), and, as our discussion of trainee characteristics indicates, there are some moderators of the impact of training on knowledge (e.g., Magley et al, , Study 2, only knowledge of non‐Hispanics increased; Perry et al, , training increased the knowledge of high LSH but not low LSH individuals).…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The trainee knowledge measures employ a variety of response formats (true/false, multiple choice, Likert scale), from five to 40 items, and all address one or more of the following topics: SH definitions, law, the organization's policies and practices, and the causes and consequences of SH. Across studies employing a variety of measures, instructional methods (e.g., lecture, discussion, and case study), and instructional media (e.g., online, video, and “live”), SH training has consistently shown to have a significant positive impact on trainees' acquisition of knowledge related to SH (e.g., Bingham & Scherer, ; Campbell et al, ; Estrada & Laurence, ). There are some exceptions to this clear pattern (Magley et al, , Study 1; Pilgram & Keyton, ), and, as our discussion of trainee characteristics indicates, there are some moderators of the impact of training on knowledge (e.g., Magley et al, , Study 2, only knowledge of non‐Hispanics increased; Perry et al, , training increased the knowledge of high LSH but not low LSH individuals).…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of 14 identified studies investigating the relationship between SH training and perceived incidence of SH, eight report that at least some types of SH training are associated with lower levels of SH (Antecol & Cobb‐Clark, ; Barak, ; Coker et al, ; Gruber, ; Jacobs et al, ; Meloni & Austin, ; Reese & Lindenberg, ; Williams, Lam, & Shively, ), and six studies did not find a relationship between SH training and the incidence of SH (de Haas et al, ; Estrada & Laurence, ; Fried et al, ; Magley et al, , Studies 1 and 2; Williams et al, ). The following observations are based on a review and comparison of the studies in those two groups.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This repeal and the lifting of the previous ban on openly gay or lesbian military service presents new concerns for the U.S. military and its service members. While much previous research has focused on the effects that repealing DADT and lifting the ban on open service would have on the military as a whole (Burrelli & Feder, 2009;National Defense Research Institute [NDRI], 2010) or on heterosexual service members (e.g., Estrada & Laurence, 2009;Estrada & Weiss, 1999;Moradi & Miller, 2010), we focus instead on concerns that individual gay or lesbian service members now face. The repeal of DADT marks new, unfamiliar ground for these individuals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%