2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2011.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining the impact of high and medium fidelity simulation experiences on nursing students’ knowledge acquisition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the simulation programme was designed to create new knowledge through nursing practice, Kolb's (1984) experiential learning theory was a particularly appropriate theoretical framework. Kolb (1984) believes that learning is a continuous process in which experience is transformed into existing cognitive frameworks to create new knowledge. In this instance the simulation programme provided what Kolb called the "concrete experience" from which observations and reflections could be derived.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Because the simulation programme was designed to create new knowledge through nursing practice, Kolb's (1984) experiential learning theory was a particularly appropriate theoretical framework. Kolb (1984) believes that learning is a continuous process in which experience is transformed into existing cognitive frameworks to create new knowledge. In this instance the simulation programme provided what Kolb called the "concrete experience" from which observations and reflections could be derived.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Role-play engages the motor as well as the cognitive system which, according to research allows the entire brain to be engaged in learning (Clapper, 2010). Cognitive learning is further complemented by emotional learning whereby learners reflecting on emotional experiences relate them back to the source of information causing the emotion to occur, thereby storing experiences into memory (Clapper, 2010;Gordon et al, 2010;Kolb, 1984;Lewis et al, 2013). While acknowledging role-play and correlations with student learning, Billings and Halstead (2005) highlight some drawbacks inherent in this simulation modality.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is a need for a variety of teaching methods to facilitate students´ learning regarding the ability to correctly perform clinical judgments (Gates, Parr, & Hughen, 2012), even though a study of showed that a majority of the nursing students modelled a flexible learning style. HFS is defined as a technology that interactively replaces or enhances real-life events (Levett-Jones, Lapkin, Hoffman, Arthur, & Roche, 2011) that offers varying degrees and methods with the potential to promote students' cognitive, associative, and psychomotor abilities in a patient-safe and realistic environment (Wotton, Davis, Button, & Kelton, 2010). Nursing students at bachelor level need the opportunity to operate in a variety of complex simulated situations to develop required competencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many studies focus on factors such as usability or student attitudes toward the use of simulation, the most useful studies are those that illustrate the relationship between simulation and some aspect of actual performance (Ericsson, Whyte, & Ward, 2007). Researchers have often focused on the relationship between simulation and knowledge, with knowledge often acting as a proxy for clinical performance (Cooper et al, 2010;Gates, Parr, & Hughen, 2012;Hauber, Cormier, & Whyte, 2010;Laschinger et al, 2008;Levett-Jones, Lapkin, Hoffman, Arthur, & Roche, 2011;Schlairet & Pollock, 2010;Whyte, Ward, & Eccles, 2009). Although some studies have demonstrated that engagement in high-fidelity clinical simulation can facilitate the knowledge required in common testing modalities (Gates et al, 2012;Hauber et al, 2010), knowledge acquisition does not necessarily facilitate improvement in actual clinical performance (Ericsson et al, 2007;Laschinger et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%