Examining the Impact of Excessive Daytime Sleepiness on Utility Scores in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnoea and/or Narcolepsy in Five European Countries

Abstract

Background: Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is a cardinal symptom of narcolepsy and affects many patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). EDS is associated with reduced quality of life, increased accident risk, and poor workplace performance. Given the impact of EDS, the ability to predict health-related utility from sleepiness is valuable for examining the cost effectiveness of novel treatments. The aim of this study was to examine the association between EDS and EQ-5D in patients with OSA and/or narcolepsy by modelling EQ-5D utility scores from Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) scores.Methods: Data were obtained from the Europe 2016/2017 National Health and Wellness Survey, an online, general population survey, designed to represent the age and gender composition of each country’s adult population. Analyses included 2,348 patients self-reporting symptomatic and diagnosed OSA (n=2,277), narcolepsy (n=48), or both (n=23). Multivariable models were used to examine ESS as a predictor of EQ-5D utility while adjusting for covariates of interest. Results were validated following the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Decision Support Unit guidelines for predictive modeling.Results: Utility decreased as EDS severity increased (no EDS: 0.711±0.251, mild: 0.685±0.261, moderate: 0.643±0.268, severe: 0.559±0.323). Whereas participants with only OSA or only narcolepsy did not differ in utility, those with both conditions had lower scores (0.685±0.266 and 0.627±0.325 vs. 0.439±0.340, respectively). Piecewise linear regression identified a single breakpoint at ESS score of 11.29. In the final model, for each point increase in ESS score, the corresponding decrease in EQ-5D utility was larger among patients with ESS scores ≥12 compared to patients with ESS scores ≤11 (model slopes: -0.0131 vs. -0.0026, respectively). Findings from the validation sample confirmed these results.Conclusions: This study demonstrates the impact of sleepiness on quality of life (QoL) and its negative impact irrespective of sleep condition (OSA or narcolepsy). The breakpoint identified is relatively consistent with the established ESS cutoff score ≥11, which demarcates pathological sleepiness. Furthermore, as EDS severity worsens (increases) on the ESS, the impact on QoL is greater.