Examining the Factors Influencing Transport Sector CO2 Emissions and Their Efficiency in Central China

Abstract

The fast development of the transport sector has resulted in high energy consumption and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in China. Though existing studies are concerned with the factors influencing transport sector CO2 emissions at the national level (or in megacities), little attention has been paid to the comprehensive impact of socio-economic, urban form, and transportation development on transport sector carbon emissions and emissions efficiency in central China. This paper examines the comprehensive impact of the transport sector’s carbon emissions from six provinces in central China, during the period from 2005 to 2016, based on the panel data model. The dynamic change of CO2 emissions efficiency is then analyzed using the Global Malmquist Luenberger Index. The results indicate that, firstly, economic growth, road density, the number of private vehicles, and the number of public vehicles have caused greater CO2 emissions during the study period, while the freight turnover, urbanization level, and urban population density had repressing effects on CO2 emissions. Secondly, an uneven distribution of CO2 emissions and CO2 emissions efficiency was found among different provinces in central China. Thirdly, changes in CO2 emissions efficiency were mainly due to technical changes. Finally, we present some policy suggestions to mitigate transport sector CO2 emissions in central China.

XCO2 Super-Resolution Reconstruction Based on Spatial Extreme Random Trees

“…In this study, we classified influencing factors into three categories: human activities, vegetation, and meteorological factors [57]. Areas with higher population density exhibit significantly higher carbon dioxide concentrations, as the distribution of emission sources such as industry and transportation directly affects carbon dioxide concentrations [58,59]. Vegetation conditions directly affect the absorption of carbon dioxide by vegetation and also influence the exchange processes between vegetation and the atmosphere.…”

A Review of the Effects of Urban and Green Space Forms on the Carbon Budget Using a Landscape Sustainability Framework

“…Compact cities are characterized by aggregated functions, a high density, and a strong transportation network [208]. Their advantages include short travel distances and travel times, low-carbon travel, mixed land use, the high accessibility of facilities, high population density and development, and an adequate public transport system [63,66,113]. Fewer private cars are used due to less urban sprawl and suburbanization, thereby reducing fossil energy consumption and vehicle emissions [56,97,209].…”

“…Dense public transport facilities (bus stops, parking lots, etc.) may increase the probability of residents traveling and driving, and an extensive road transport network may lead to the excessive expansion of the city, thereby increasing vehicle emissions [42,66]. Although the degree of urban land aggregation is improved, unreasonable resource allocation may increase carbon emissions [47].…”

Evaluating the Relationship between Freight Transport, Economic Prosperity, Urbanization, and CO2 Emissions: Evidence from Hong Kong, Singapore, and South Korea

“…Many previous studies [43][44][45] have been concerned with urbanization impact on transport CO 2 emissions. Hasan et al [44] result indicated that, with the increase of the urban population, CO 2 emissions from the New Zealand transport sector have increased.…”