2021
DOI: 10.1093/af/vfab056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining the extent of environmental contributions toward DNA methylation and phenotypic variation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Age‐related decline in the accuracy of traditional ageing methods is common in all three study species (Foley et al., 2021; Harshyne et al., 1998; Stevens & Houston, 1989; Storm et al., 2014). External factors such as disease (e.g., Bobak et al., 2022), inbreeding (Larison et al., 2021) and stress (Pacht et al., 2021; Zannas et al., 2015) can also influence biological ageing in the form of DNAm and could also be contributing uncertainty to the model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Age‐related decline in the accuracy of traditional ageing methods is common in all three study species (Foley et al., 2021; Harshyne et al., 1998; Stevens & Houston, 1989; Storm et al., 2014). External factors such as disease (e.g., Bobak et al., 2022), inbreeding (Larison et al., 2021) and stress (Pacht et al., 2021; Zannas et al., 2015) can also influence biological ageing in the form of DNAm and could also be contributing uncertainty to the model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Age-related decline in the accuracy of traditional aging methods is common in all three study species (Stevens & Houston, 1989;Harshyne et al, 1998;Storm et al, 2014;Foley et al, 2021). External factors like disease (e.g., Bobak et al, 2022), inbreeding (Larison et al, 2021) and stress (Zannas et al, 2015;Pacht et al, 2021) can also influence biological aging in the form of DNAm and could also be contributing uncertainty to the model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of non-human epigenetic aging studies have focused on captive model species, leading to a gap in knowledge of wild populations of large mammals (Tangili et al, 2023). Environmental factors such as diet and stress can impact DNA methylation and aging rates (Tangili et al, 2023; Pacht et al, 2021), so the results from captive species might not be generalizable to wild populations, which experience more environmental variability (Tangili et al, 2023). In addition, large and small mammals are known to exhibit vastly different life histories and aging rates, potentially impacting the rate of DNAm (Austad, 1997; Tangili et al, 2023) and likely increasing the variance of the universal DNA methylation clock.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation