2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining the effects of HIV self-testing compared to standard HIV testing services in the general population: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Background: We updated a 2017 systematic review and compared the effects of HIV self-testing (HIVST) to standard HIV testing services to understand effective service delivery models among the general population. Methods: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing testing outcomes with HIVST to standard testing in the general population and published between January 1, 2006 and June 4, 2019. Random effects meta-analysis was conducted and pooled risk ratios (RRs) were reported. The certainty of ev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
48
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
8
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…UTT interventions are intensive testing programmes designed to find even the hardest-to-reach populations. Systematic review and meta-analysis of linkage to treatment or care following HIVST in the general population has found limited but encouraging evidence of successful linkage among HIVST users [ 31 ]. Further research is needed to assess cost-effective and sustainable interventions designed to strengthen linkage to treatment and care following HIVST, such as assisted referrals and home ART initiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UTT interventions are intensive testing programmes designed to find even the hardest-to-reach populations. Systematic review and meta-analysis of linkage to treatment or care following HIVST in the general population has found limited but encouraging evidence of successful linkage among HIVST users [ 31 ]. Further research is needed to assess cost-effective and sustainable interventions designed to strengthen linkage to treatment and care following HIVST, such as assisted referrals and home ART initiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are concerns that people self‐testing for infectious diseases may not behave in the optimal manner to maximise public health benefits of the self‐test upon receiving their result. These concerns have been assessed in HIV and hepatitis C self‐testing acceptability studies [ 22 , 23 ]. In the present survey, the majority of respondents expressed that, if they self‐tested positive for SARS‐CoV‐2, they would continue adhering to health authorities recommendations such as wearing masks and/or reporting the result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in the Netherlands 11 ). In a systematic review of HIV self-testing in which most identified studies were from sub-Saharan Africa, there were similar numbers of participants linked to HIV care/treatment among those diagnosed through self-testing and those diagnosed by standard testing suggesting that self-testing has the potential to lead to similar levels of management of chronic conditions 31 ; however, further research is needed to explore this in detail for other chronic conditions in areas of low health literacy. Finally, while the researchers received training in the use of the self-assessment kits and measurements, including in the application of World Health Organization protocols for anthropometry 13 and International Society of Hypertension protocols for blood pressure measurement 14 , it is possible that they made errors in their measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%