2009
DOI: 10.1037/a0015576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining the effects of classroom discussion on students’ comprehension of text: A meta-analysis.

Abstract: The role of classroom discussions in comprehension and learning has been the focus of investigations since the early 1960s. Despite this long history, no syntheses have quantitatively reviewed the vast body of literature on classroom discussions for their effects on students' comprehension and learning. This comprehensive meta-analysis of empirical studies was conducted to examine evidence of the effects of classroom discussion on measures of teacher and student talk and on individual student comprehension and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
245
1
24

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 417 publications
(301 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
7
245
1
24
Order By: Relevance
“…Taylor, Pearson, Clark, & Walpole, 1999) and small-scale, experimental studies (Saunders & Goldenberg, 1999) have linked higher-level discussions to better performance on measures of reading comprehension. An important insight in this respect is that it is not the amount of talk but the kind of talk that promotes comprehension (Murphy et al, 2009).…”
Section: Strategy Instruction In the Dialogic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Taylor, Pearson, Clark, & Walpole, 1999) and small-scale, experimental studies (Saunders & Goldenberg, 1999) have linked higher-level discussions to better performance on measures of reading comprehension. An important insight in this respect is that it is not the amount of talk but the kind of talk that promotes comprehension (Murphy et al, 2009).…”
Section: Strategy Instruction In the Dialogic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although attention to the role of classroom dialogue goes all the way back to the 1860s (Nystrand, 2006), research on how structured discussions may 'scaffold' (Wood, Bruner, & Ross, 1976) higher-order thinking about texts has provided a number of new insights. For example, allowing conflicting perspectives to meet, open-ended (or authentic) questioning and dialogue may support student reflections on alternative interpretations and encourage them to elaborate on their understandings in ways that foster narrative comprehension (Applebee et al, 2003;Murphy, Wilkinson, Soter, Hennessey, & Alexander, 2009;Nystrand, 2006). In addition, both large-scale, observational studies (c.f.…”
Section: Strategy Instruction In the Dialogic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dialogue is the most significant procedure of philosophical inquiry method. Studies demonstrate that dialogue is an effective tool to stimulate classroom engagement (Rubin, 2006;Murphy, Wilkinson, Soter, Hennessey, & Alexander, 2009;Walker, Wartenberg, & Winner, 2012;Slakmon & Schwartz, 2014;Gillies, 2015).…”
Section: Philosophical Inquirymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of such an approach, students must then be given the opportunity to engage with both teachers and other students on meaningful content, in order to learn and develop. Especially conversations about texts are seen as particularly beneficial to students' reading skills in that teachers and students can pool their different readings and let them go into dialogue against each other in the classroom (Murphy et al, 2009;Nystrand et al, 1997;Soter et al, 2008). In addition to being an arena for curriculum-driven education, the classroom is also a place where students build relationships and form their identities in interaction with each other and the teacher.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical studies indicate in various ways that dialogue-based reading instruction, involving discussions about texts and other collectively-based teaching methods, is beneficial to students' reading ability in multiple ways (Applebee et al, 2003;Gamoran & Nystrand, 1991;Murphy et al, 2009;Nystrand et al, 1997;Soter et al, 2008). A majority of the studies on discussions about texts in classrooms are studies that focus on literature discussions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%