2019
DOI: 10.1097/phh.0000000000000860
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining the Effectiveness of Year-Round School Calendars on Improving Educational Attainment Outcomes Within the Context of Advancement of Health Equity: A Community Guide Systematic Review

Abstract: Students may lose knowledge and skills achieved in the school year during the summer break, with losses greatest for students from low-income families. Community Guide systematic review methods were used to summarize evaluations (published 1965-2015) of the effectiveness of year-round school calendars (YRSCs) on academic achievement, a determinant of long-term health. In single-track YRSCs, all students participate in the same school calendar; summer breaks are replaced by short “intersessions” distributed eve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Graves’ 2011 study showed YRE had negative effects on standardized test scores of various student subgroups. Finnie et al (2019) analyzed and summarized the most recent YRE research and concluded that, although Graves’ results were not the only statistically significant negative findings, the majority of existent literature suggests only minimal positive results on academic achievement. They also note what numerous other researchers have also concluded that the body of research yields insufficient evidence to definitively claim YRE will consistently benefit disadvantaged students.…”
Section: The Case For Maintaining Tcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Graves’ 2011 study showed YRE had negative effects on standardized test scores of various student subgroups. Finnie et al (2019) analyzed and summarized the most recent YRE research and concluded that, although Graves’ results were not the only statistically significant negative findings, the majority of existent literature suggests only minimal positive results on academic achievement. They also note what numerous other researchers have also concluded that the body of research yields insufficient evidence to definitively claim YRE will consistently benefit disadvantaged students.…”
Section: The Case For Maintaining Tcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An issue this paper examines, that could be addressed with YRE and ESY, is persistent achievement gaps between high and low SES—often intensified by long summer breaks (Finnie et al, 2019). The standard summer break in TCS often accounts for learning loss that can lead to cumulative academic deficiencies, especially prevalent among low-income and low-achieving students (Tiruchittampalam et al, 2018; Lenhoff et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A last example is the one of the school calendar change. While its intentions are laudable and it can be said to have psychobiological foundations (FAPEO, 2008; Mouraux, 1992; Testu & Fontaine, 2001), the reform of the school calendar is not based on any evidence of its educational effectiveness in terms of academic achievement (Finnie et al, 2019).…”
Section: The Pact For Educational Excellencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Educational leaders and learning scientists often see similar problems but articulate their research questions differently, leading to distinct ways of both measuring progress toward objectives as well as the choice of appropriate activities. For example, both learning scientists as well as educational leaders are concerned about the curriculum (e.g., Glatthorn et al, 2018;Tokuhama-Espinosa, 2019), the school calendar (e.g., Farbman et al, 2015;Finnie et al, 2018), and teacher training (e.g., Allen and Penuel, 2015;Darling-Hammond et al, 2017), but they approach these issues differently based on the words they use to state their objectives. The literature suggests at least 30 questions for which both educational leaders and learning scientists have conducted research and sought answers (see Table 1).…”
Section: Problem Framing and Articulationmentioning
confidence: 99%