2017
DOI: 10.1002/mar.21012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining the Effectiveness of Fear Appeals in Prompting Help-Seeking: The Case of At-Risk Gamblers

Abstract: With a sample of Australian at-risk gamblers, this research examines the impact of gender and individual difference in experiential avoidance (EA; cognitive and emotional suppression) on the processing of fear appeals. Study 1, through thematic analysis, explores fear appeal perceptions among at-risk gamblers. The results identify that relevant threats, such as social and psychological, should be integrated into fear-inducing advertising stimuli. Study 2 uses multigroup comparisons in structural equation model… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(111 reference statements)
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the fear appeal that fails to advocate for positive outcome expectancy, or inform how this might be achieved, Rogers' (1975, 1983) Protection‐Motivation (PM) theory offers a comprehensive model to theorise coping responses. The emphasis is on four cognitive processes: estimated severity of the event, vulnerability or the expectancy that the event could occur, coping responses' efficacy (the perceived availability/efficacy of a coping response), and self‐efficacy (De Vos et al, 2017; Maddux & Rogers, 1983). In other words, the PM theory shows that when the presence of a threat is revealed, by any source of information (i.e., the media), the person then engages in certain cognitive processes of which he/she appraises the magnitude of this threat, the likelihood of facing that threat himself/herself, the availability of effective coping responses that can be followed to counter such a threat if ever happened to him/her, and how feasible these responses are to him/her.…”
Section: Discussion and Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the fear appeal that fails to advocate for positive outcome expectancy, or inform how this might be achieved, Rogers' (1975, 1983) Protection‐Motivation (PM) theory offers a comprehensive model to theorise coping responses. The emphasis is on four cognitive processes: estimated severity of the event, vulnerability or the expectancy that the event could occur, coping responses' efficacy (the perceived availability/efficacy of a coping response), and self‐efficacy (De Vos et al, 2017; Maddux & Rogers, 1983). In other words, the PM theory shows that when the presence of a threat is revealed, by any source of information (i.e., the media), the person then engages in certain cognitive processes of which he/she appraises the magnitude of this threat, the likelihood of facing that threat himself/herself, the availability of effective coping responses that can be followed to counter such a threat if ever happened to him/her, and how feasible these responses are to him/her.…”
Section: Discussion and Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, long-term effects are less well known. For people with gambling problems, adults who had lower experiential avoidance were more responsive to fear-inducing warnings than were those with higher experiential avoidance (88).…”
Section: Use Honest Warnings Regarding Negative Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…20 However, the long-term effects of threating messages are unknown, and individual differences (such as fear) may explain why fear motivates some people to change their gambling, but not others. 24 5. Use simple, descriptive messages rather than longer and more complex warnings.…”
Section: Recommendations For Warning Labelsmentioning
confidence: 99%