“…In contrast to the fear appeal that fails to advocate for positive outcome expectancy, or inform how this might be achieved, Rogers' (1975, 1983) Protection‐Motivation (PM) theory offers a comprehensive model to theorise coping responses. The emphasis is on four cognitive processes: estimated severity of the event, vulnerability or the expectancy that the event could occur, coping responses' efficacy (the perceived availability/efficacy of a coping response), and self‐efficacy (De Vos et al, 2017; Maddux & Rogers, 1983). In other words, the PM theory shows that when the presence of a threat is revealed, by any source of information (i.e., the media), the person then engages in certain cognitive processes of which he/she appraises the magnitude of this threat, the likelihood of facing that threat himself/herself, the availability of effective coping responses that can be followed to counter such a threat if ever happened to him/her, and how feasible these responses are to him/her.…”