2013
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2011.0132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining the Differential Longitudinal Performance of Directive versus Empowering Leadership in Teams

Abstract: Content may NOT be copied, e-mailed, shared or otherwise transmitted without written permission. This non-copyedited article version was obtained from the Academy of Management InPress website and is intended for personal or individual use.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
404
3
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 332 publications
(448 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
13
404
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A poor team leader thus can neutralize the effects of a good staff and vice versa, a reason why in the literature, weak leader behaviors are often cited as the main cause of poor team performance (Bergman et al, 2012;LePine et al, 1997). As a consequence, extensive research has emphasized the importance of leader behaviors for team performance (Burke et al, 2006;Judge, Piccolo, & Ilies, 2004;Lorinkova et al, 2013;Srivastava et al, 2006).…”
Section: Leadership Style and Team Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A poor team leader thus can neutralize the effects of a good staff and vice versa, a reason why in the literature, weak leader behaviors are often cited as the main cause of poor team performance (Bergman et al, 2012;LePine et al, 1997). As a consequence, extensive research has emphasized the importance of leader behaviors for team performance (Burke et al, 2006;Judge, Piccolo, & Ilies, 2004;Lorinkova et al, 2013;Srivastava et al, 2006).…”
Section: Leadership Style and Team Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common perspectives are coaching related activities (Hackman & Wageman, 2005), shared or co-leadership (Bergman et al, 2012;Carson, Tesluk, & Marrone, 2007), promoting team learning (Day & Gronn, 2004), boundary spanning (Druskat & Wheeler, 2003), leader behavior studies (Burke et al, 2006) and contingency leadership theory (House, 1996;Lorinkova et al, 2013;Yun et al, 2005). The last approach is of particular interest for the current research.…”
Section: Leadership Style and Team Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations