Examining the Current Legal Environment Facing the Public Accounting Profession: Recommendations for a Consistent U.S. Policy

Abstract

We examine the recent history and trends of U.S. auditor liability to third parties to help regulators and legislators develop policies to protect and maintain audit quality while limiting auditor liability exposure. Although the United States has yet developed a formal policy to address auditor liability, some European Union member countries and Australia, in varying degrees, support such limitation. Thus, we also explore current EU and Australian policies as examples of potential recommendations to U.S. policy makers. In light of a litigious environment, U.S. Certified Public Accounting firms generally accept potential clients only after analyzing potential risks, dismiss many risky clients, raise their total or hourly fees, spend more time examining attestation evidence, and perform other procedures to reduce their litigation risk. This risk arises largely from the federal and state legal systems, assuming that auditors can better absorb and control losses from misleading financial statements than can financial statement users. While culpable, this litigious environment led to the demise of two large international Certified Public Accounting firms—Arthur Andersen and Laventhol & Horwath. Is the global economy better off having fewer accounting firms with the capacity to perform international audits? A Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s recent Exposure Draft would require auditors of issuers to expand significantly their audit reports beyond current Pass/Fail standards, which could increase audit firms’ disclosures and resultant liabilities. After examining U.S. federal and state statutes plus court decisions regarding auditor liability, we suggest methods to protect the public while allowing audit firms to thrive in these environments.

Judicial hellholes and other differential characteristics: is state-level legal risk reflected in audit fee pricing?

“…Our sample ranges from 2001 to 2018 and there have been some important changes during that period. Reinstein et al (2020, p. 7) report a trend emerged toward states narrowing the scope of duty for nonclients. Some states limited accountants’ liability to third parties through statues.…”

The quest for morally competent future Muslim accountants

“…Accountants are considered the gatekeepers of the crucial financial information of an organization. It is thus important that they always act professionally in discharging their duties by stringently following laid down laws and procedures that govern the profession (Dattin, 2016; Herbert et al , 2016; Reinstein et al , 2017).…”

Judicial Independence and Domestic Supply Chain: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment

“…Strong legal institutions restrict government exploitation on firms, protect firms' rights and interests [9], and bring better creditor protection [10]. Legal environment enhancement can reduce firms' litigation risk [11], improve judicial quality [12], and enhance anti-monopoly supervision [13]. Transparent and effective judiciary can reduce the likelihood of local governments implementing market segmentation strategies in pursuit of political promotion.…”