2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining the context, logistics, and outcomes of food prescription programs: A scoping review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite this, however, the majority of participants described their overall health as "better" or "the same" as one year prior during the post-intervention survey, perhaps underscoring limitations of the CCHS General Health survey tool in identifying modest longitudinal improvements in self-perceived health (49). Overall, our research corresponds to other studies that show mixed or minimal impacts on measurable health outcomes resulting from food prescribing programs (11,12), although most interventions are short-lived (i.e., between 12 and 52 weeks), few measure clinical health outcomes, and further longitudinal studies are needed to assess long-term nutritional impacts (12,50).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite this, however, the majority of participants described their overall health as "better" or "the same" as one year prior during the post-intervention survey, perhaps underscoring limitations of the CCHS General Health survey tool in identifying modest longitudinal improvements in self-perceived health (49). Overall, our research corresponds to other studies that show mixed or minimal impacts on measurable health outcomes resulting from food prescribing programs (11,12), although most interventions are short-lived (i.e., between 12 and 52 weeks), few measure clinical health outcomes, and further longitudinal studies are needed to assess long-term nutritional impacts (12,50).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Despite this, our study exhibits several strengths. The intervention was 52 weeks, which is longer than most previously published evaluations of food prescribing interventions (12,50) and allowed us to assess long-term impacts on participants. We used validated research tools to assess food security, food consumption, and self-reported health.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies examining their effectiveness have shown that interventions involving screening and referral for SDOH can enhance physicians’ awareness of the prevalence of these determinants. However, a lack of training, guidance, and support for healthcare providers hampers the early detection of ACEs and the connection of local healthcare services with food assistance programs [ 22 , 33 ]. Recently, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid have started offering incentives to encourage innovation in the screening and addressing SDOH, further promoting their adoption in medical practices [ 5 ].…”
Section: Healthcare Workers’ Role In Screening Liaison Evaluation And...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common model is fruit and vegetable vouchers, constituting 63% of these initiatives. Vouchers offer a designated value for fresh produce at specific locations [ 33 ]. Food Prescription Programs (FPPs) offer discounted or free vouchers for fruits and vegetables to those with food insecurity and chronic conditions.…”
Section: Models and Tools Related To Sdohmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meta-analysis that studied the context, analysis, and scope of food prescription programs found that there are questions about food programs’ long-term effectiveness, impact on health behaviors, screening of eligible participants, and logistics of program implementation [ 11 ]. Additionally, a systematic review of articles regarding food prescriptions' impact found that most studies conducted on food programs’ effectiveness had small sample sizes [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%