2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2007.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining the consistency of products derived from various ocean color sensors in open ocean (Case 1) waters in the perspective of a multi-sensor approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
468
3
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 517 publications
(513 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
15
468
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The timeframes of the data (1994-1999; 1992-2010) largely pre-dated the MODIS-Aqua satellite data (2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010), hence SeaWiFS data (1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010) were also used to validate and improve the photic depth product for the GBR ecosystem. Two operational photic depth algorithms have been implemented into the standard NASA ocean color satellite data processing environment, both of which are available via the SeaWiFS Data Analysis System (SeaDAS; http://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov/seadas): an empirical algorithm based on Case-1 assumptions [21] and a semi-analytical algorithm based on the inherent optical properties (IOPs) of the water column [4]. The IOP approach, where photic depth is described as a function of spectral absorption and backscattering coefficients, was selected for this study as the water-clarity algorithm to determine light penetration depth in eutrophic, Case-2 coastal waters [6].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The timeframes of the data (1994-1999; 1992-2010) largely pre-dated the MODIS-Aqua satellite data (2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010), hence SeaWiFS data (1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010) were also used to validate and improve the photic depth product for the GBR ecosystem. Two operational photic depth algorithms have been implemented into the standard NASA ocean color satellite data processing environment, both of which are available via the SeaWiFS Data Analysis System (SeaDAS; http://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov/seadas): an empirical algorithm based on Case-1 assumptions [21] and a semi-analytical algorithm based on the inherent optical properties (IOPs) of the water column [4]. The IOP approach, where photic depth is described as a function of spectral absorption and backscattering coefficients, was selected for this study as the water-clarity algorithm to determine light penetration depth in eutrophic, Case-2 coastal waters [6].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the depth where Photosynthetically Available Radiation (PAR) is reduced to 1% of its value just below the surface). The euphotic depth was estimated from surface TCHLa using the method of Morel et al (2007) and cross-checked with in-situ measurements of PAR. 2) To minimise the effect of seasonality, we separated the data collected during boreal spring and autumn (AMT cruises April-May-June and September-October-November).…”
Section: Hplc Pigment Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assumed an average k(PAR) light attenuation coefficient of 0.15 for the study region; this value was previously reported for the water column above a seagrass meadow in the Canary Islands (Tuya et al, 2002). Values of k(PAR) may have been alternatively derived from remote sensing using the K(490) product data for offshore waters (Morel et al, 2007). However, remote sensing derived k(PAR) is not suitable for coastal waters.…”
Section: Natural Influences: Satellite-derived Datamentioning
confidence: 99%