Examining the Availability and Accessibility of Rehabilitation Services in a Rural District of South Africa: A Mixed-Methods Study

Abstract

Introduction: Rehabilitation services aim to optimise individuals’ functioning and reduce disability. However, people with disabilities, who represent a key population of users of rehabilitation services, continue to have unmet needs for rehabilitation services that include the provision of assistive devices. This paper examines the availability and accessibility of rehabilitation services in a rural district of South Africa in order to explore why unmet needs for rehabilitation services persist. Methods: All nine district hospitals in a rural district of South Africa were included in the study. Rehabilitation services capacity was assessed by examining the available assistive devices, consumables and human resources at the level of the health facility. Data collection was conducted using the Global Co-operative Assistive Technology [GATE] Assistive Products List, AT2030’s ATScale priority list and the South African National Catalogue of Commodities for Primary Health Care Facilities. Descriptive statistics were then used for the analysis. For the qualitative component, semi-structured interviews were conducted with adults with physical disabilities at household level to explore barriers to accessing assistive device inclusive rehabilitation services and the consequences thereof in the same rural district. An interview guide based on the WHO health system building blocks was used. Thematic content analysis guided the analysis of the interview transcripts. Findings: The findings of the research demonstrate that rehabilitation service capacity in the district was constrained as a result of low availability of assistive devices [2–22%] and consumables [2–47%], as well as, possibly, a shortage of rehabilitation providers [n = 30] with an unequal distribution across health facilities [n = 9]. In addition, people with physical disabilities reported poor referral pathways, financial constraints, transport and road consideration and equipment unavailability as barriers to accessing rehabilitation services. Moreover, these barriers to access predisposed individuals to finance-, health- and person-related harm. Conclusion: Rehabilitation service availability is constrained by a lack of service capacity in rural South Africa. In addition, the rehabilitation services in district hospitals are not adequately accessible because of existing barriers to enable key populations to achieve optimised functioning.

Stroke Rehabilitation in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

“…However, only a limited range of therapeutic options exist in most LMIC settings. A 2021 study of rehabilitation services across nine hospitals in one rural South African district found that patients’ needs were not met because of a lack of assistive devices that could be used for mobility training, such as walkers, canes, wheelchairs, and ankle braces, resulting in very limited rehabilitation options and compromising patients’ recovery potential 11 …”

Cardiovascular diseases in Africa in the twenty-first century: Gaps and priorities going forward

“…Finally, there is evidence that the development of multi-disciplinary specialized care centers to manage post-MI and stroke patients leads to improved outcomes ( 71 ). Multi-disciplinary specialized care centers have been successfully implemented in some parts of the African region ( 72 ) and it is important that such efforts are scaled up throughout the continent.…”

Non-use of healthcare services among persons with mobility impairments in Cofimvaba, South Africa

“…Visagie and Swartz ( 2016 ), as well as Magaqa, Ariana and Polack ( 2021 ), confirmed these rehabilitation challenges in their recent studies. The difficulties often experienced by persons with disabilities include service accessibility and/or inaccessible physical or built environment; receiving lower-quality services and added extra costs for healthcare services (Kuper & Heydt 2019 ); discrimination and social stigma (Hashemi et al 2020 ; Mitchell et al 2022); and knowledge, information and communication barriers (Hashemi et al 2020 ; Mitchel et al 2022).…”