2016
DOI: 10.1080/03630242.2016.1235076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining the association between motivations for induced abortion and method safety among women in Ghana

Abstract: This article draws on data from 552 women interviewed in the 2007 Ghana Maternal Health Survey to examine the association between motivations for women's pregnancy terminations and the safety of methods used. Women's reasons for induced abortions represented their vulnerability types at the critical time of decision making. Different motivations can result in taking various forms of action with the most vulnerable potentially resorting to the most harmful behaviors. Analysis of survey data pointed to spacing/d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We did not have data on the method of abortion, therefore this could not be used as a criterion for classifying the safety of abortion. However, methods used to estimate unsafe abortion rates vary widely across studies,2 21–24 and there are discrepancies between how the WHO definition is worded and how it has been practically applied to measure the burden of unsafe abortion 25. Because there were some factors identified in the literature as important risk factors for unsafe abortion (including, eg, sexual behaviour, partners’ approval of abortion, reasons for abortion, pregnancy wantedness and exposure to media), for which data from the AHS were not available, there is a risk of residual confounding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We did not have data on the method of abortion, therefore this could not be used as a criterion for classifying the safety of abortion. However, methods used to estimate unsafe abortion rates vary widely across studies,2 21–24 and there are discrepancies between how the WHO definition is worded and how it has been practically applied to measure the burden of unsafe abortion 25. Because there were some factors identified in the literature as important risk factors for unsafe abortion (including, eg, sexual behaviour, partners’ approval of abortion, reasons for abortion, pregnancy wantedness and exposure to media), for which data from the AHS were not available, there is a risk of residual confounding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Young women are more exposed to unintended pregnancies and the resultant unsafe abortions, severe illness, STI/HIV infections, infertility and even death as a result of unprotected sexual intercourse [ 4 , 5 ]. For example, young women in Ghana have relatively higher vulnerability to the risk of unsafe abortions because they lack financial and social support for pregnancy and child care [ 6 , 7 ]. In addition, pervasive challenges to the young mother and child, viz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the information available, we did not know in what kind of settings the FSWs accessed abortion. We do know that FSWs have limited economic options, low education and many dependents [ 50 ] and those factors place them at higher risk of unsafe abortion [ 51 53 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%